Mixpeek vs Twelve Labs

A detailed look at how Mixpeek compares to Twelve Labs.

Mixpeek

Twelve Labs

Key Differentiators

Key Mixpeek Advantages

Broad Multimodal Support (Video, Audio, Image, Text, PDF).
Composable pipeline architecture for end-to-end workflows.
Supports diverse feature extractors and retrievers.
Flexible deployment for various infrastructure needs.

Key Twelve Labs Strengths

Advanced AI models for deep video understanding.
Multimodal search capabilities specifically for video content.
Focus on action recognition, object tracking, and spoken words in video.
Developer-friendly APIs for video intelligence.

TL;DR: Mixpeek offers a broad, customizable platform for diverse multimodal data, while Twelve Labs provides powerful, specialized APIs for video understanding and search.

Mixpeek vs. Twelve Labs

🧠 Vision & Positioning

Feature / Dimension	Mixpeek	Twelve Labs
Core Pitch	Turn raw multimodal media into structured, searchable intelligence	Foundation models for video understanding
Primary Users	Developers, ML teams, solutions engineers	Developers building video-centric applications
Approach	API-first, service-enabled AI pipelines	API-first, specialized video AI models
Deployment Focus	Flexible: hosted, hybrid, or embedded	Cloud API

🔍 Tech Stack & Product Surface

Feature / Dimension	Mixpeek	Twelve Labs
Supported Modalities	Video (frame + scene-level), audio, PDFs, images, text	Primarily Video; extracts text, speech, objects from video
Custom Pipelines	Yes – pluggable extractors, retrievers, indexers	No – Uses their defined video processing pipeline
Retrieval Model Support	ColBERT, ColPaLI, SPLADE, hybrid RAG, multimodal fusion	Proprietary multimodal embeddings for video search
Real-time Support	Yes – RTSP feeds, alerts, live inference	Async processing for uploaded videos, potential for live (check docs)
Embedding-level Tuning	Yes – per-customer tuning, chunking, semantic dedup, etc.	Limited, primarily through their model offerings
Developer SDK	Open-source SDK + custom API generation	Yes, client SDKs for their API

⚙️ Use Cases

Feature / Dimension	Mixpeek	Twelve Labs
General Multimodal Search	✅ Across all supported types	🚫 Focused on video search
Video Content Moderation	✅ Customizable pipelines	✅ Strong capability for video
Video Ad Targeting/Analytics	✅ High potential with scene/object data	✅ Core use case for video intelligence
Image/PDF/Audio Search	✅ Supported	🚫 Not primary focus
Custom Internal Tooling for Video	✅ Flexible, build any video tool	✅ Good for specific video tasks via API

📈 Business Strategy

Feature / Dimension	Mixpeek	Twelve Labs
GTM	SA-led land-and-expand + dev-first motion	Developer-first, API-driven adoption
Service Layer	✅ Solutions team builds pipelines and templates	Developer support, documentation
Monetization Model	Contracted services + platform usage	Usage-based API calls, tiered plans
Customer Feedback Loop	Bespoke deployments inform core product	Developer community, direct API user feedback
Community/Open Source	✅ SDK + app ecosystem via mxp.co/apps	Active developer community, some open tools/examples

🏆 TL;DR: Mixpeek vs. Twelve Labs

Feature / Dimension	Mixpeek	Twelve Labs
Best for	Building diverse multimodal applications	Adding advanced video intelligence to apps
Breadth vs. Depth	Broad multimodal platform	Deep video-specific AI

Ready to See Mixpeek in Action?

Discover how Mixpeek's multimodal AI platform can transform your data workflows and unlock new insights. Let us show you how we compare and why leading teams choose Mixpeek.

Book a Demo Contact Sales

Explore Other Comparisons

Mixpeek vs Coactive AI

See how Mixpeek's developer-first, API-driven multimodal AI platform compares against Coactive AI's UI-centric media management.

View Details

Mixpeek vs Glean

Compare Mixpeek's deep multimodal analysis with Glean's AI-powered enterprise search and knowledge discovery capabilities.

View Details