Best RAG Frameworks & Platforms in 2026
A practical comparison of frameworks and platforms for building Retrieval-Augmented Generation applications. We tested each on multi-document QA, citation accuracy, and multimodal RAG scenarios.
How We Evaluated
Retrieval Quality
Accuracy of document retrieval, chunk relevance, and citation precision in generated answers.
Multimodal Support
Ability to retrieve and reason over images, tables, charts, and mixed-media documents.
Production Readiness
Scalability, observability, evaluation tools, and operational maturity for production deployments.
Developer Experience
Ease of setup, documentation quality, community size, and flexibility of abstractions.
Mixpeek
End-to-end multimodal RAG platform with built-in document processing, embedding generation, and advanced retrieval. Supports ColBERT, SPLADE, and hybrid retrieval strategies out of the box.
Pros
- +Native multimodal RAG (text + images + video + audio)
- +Advanced retrieval with ColBERT, ColPaLI, and hybrid fusion
- +Managed pipeline from raw documents to retrieval
- +Self-hosted deployment for sensitive data
Cons
- -Less flexible for non-standard LLM orchestration patterns
- -Smaller community compared to LangChain
- -Opinionated about retrieval architecture
LangChain
The most popular framework for building LLM applications, including RAG. Provides extensive abstractions for document loading, splitting, embedding, retrieval, and generation with a large ecosystem of integrations.
Pros
- +Largest ecosystem of integrations and examples
- +Very flexible and composable architecture
- +Strong community and documentation
- +LangSmith for observability and evaluation
Cons
- -Abstractions can be over-engineered for simple use cases
- -Performance overhead from framework layers
- -Multimodal RAG requires significant custom work
- -Rapid API changes can break existing code
LlamaIndex
Data framework for LLM applications focused on connecting custom data sources to LLMs. Strong abstractions for indexing, retrieval, and query engines with good support for structured data.
Pros
- +Purpose-built for RAG and data retrieval
- +Good support for structured and semi-structured data
- +Multiple index types (vector, keyword, knowledge graph)
- +LlamaCloud for managed RAG pipelines
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than LangChain
- -Multimodal support still developing
- -Smaller community than LangChain
- -Some advanced features require LlamaCloud (paid)
Haystack (deepset)
Open-source framework for building NLP and RAG applications with a pipeline-based architecture. Strong focus on production readiness with deepset Cloud for managed deployments.
Pros
- +Clean pipeline-based architecture
- +Good production tooling and evaluation
- +Strong document processing capabilities
- +deepset Cloud for managed deployments
Cons
- -Smaller integration ecosystem than LangChain
- -Pipeline paradigm can be rigid for some use cases
- -Multimodal support is limited
- -Documentation gaps for advanced patterns
Vercel AI SDK
TypeScript-first AI SDK with built-in support for RAG patterns, streaming, and edge deployment. Designed for Next.js and modern web applications with good DX.
Pros
- +Excellent TypeScript developer experience
- +Built-in streaming and edge compatibility
- +Good integration with Vercel deployment
- +Simple abstractions for common RAG patterns
Cons
- -TypeScript/JavaScript only
- -Less feature-rich than Python-based frameworks
- -Limited advanced retrieval strategies
- -Smaller ecosystem of data connectors
Frequently Asked Questions
What is RAG and why is it important?
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) combines information retrieval with LLM text generation. Instead of relying solely on the LLM's training data, RAG retrieves relevant documents from your own data and includes them in the prompt context. This reduces hallucinations, keeps answers grounded in your data, and allows the LLM to access information it was not trained on.
How do I evaluate RAG quality?
Key metrics include: context relevance (are retrieved documents relevant?), faithfulness (does the answer match the retrieved context?), answer relevance (does it address the question?), and citation accuracy (are sources correctly attributed?). Tools like RAGAS, LangSmith, and Phoenix provide automated evaluation. Always supplement with human evaluation on a representative sample.
What is multimodal RAG?
Multimodal RAG retrieves and reasons over content beyond text, including images, charts, tables, video clips, and audio segments. For example, answering a question by retrieving a relevant chart from a PDF and describing its contents. Platforms like Mixpeek handle multimodal RAG natively, while text-focused frameworks like LangChain require additional integration work.
Should I use a framework or a managed platform for RAG?
Frameworks (LangChain, LlamaIndex) give you maximum control and flexibility but require you to manage infrastructure, embedding pipelines, and vector databases yourself. Managed platforms (Mixpeek, LlamaCloud) handle the infrastructure and provide optimized retrieval out of the box. Choose a framework if you have specific architectural requirements; choose a platform if you want to focus on application logic rather than infrastructure.
Ready to Get Started with Mixpeek?
See why teams choose Mixpeek for multimodal AI. Book a demo to explore how our platform can transform your data workflows.
Explore Other Curated Lists
Best Multimodal AI APIs
A hands-on comparison of the top multimodal AI APIs for processing text, images, video, and audio through a single integration. We evaluated latency, modality coverage, retrieval quality, and developer experience.
Best Video Search Tools
We tested the leading video search and understanding platforms on real-world content libraries. This guide covers visual search, scene detection, transcript-based retrieval, and action recognition.
Best AI Content Moderation Tools
We evaluated content moderation platforms across image, video, text, and audio moderation. This guide covers accuracy, latency, customization, and compliance features for trust and safety teams.