Best Visual Search APIs in 2026
A comparison of APIs that enable search-by-image functionality for ecommerce, stock photography, and visual asset management. We tested with real product catalogs and image libraries.
How We Evaluated
Visual Similarity Accuracy
Quality of image-to-image similarity matching across diverse visual categories.
Text-to-Image Search
Ability to find images using natural language descriptions rather than reference images.
Performance at Scale
Query latency and throughput with millions of indexed images.
Customization
Ability to fine-tune for specific visual domains and integrate custom features.
Mixpeek
Multimodal search platform with advanced visual search capabilities. Supports image-to-image, text-to-image, and cross-modal search with customizable feature extraction pipelines.
Pros
- +Cross-modal search across images, video frames, and text
- +Customizable feature extractors for specific visual domains
- +Advanced retrieval models beyond basic cosine similarity
- +Self-hosted option for sensitive image collections
Cons
- -Requires pipeline configuration for optimal results
- -Not a drop-in widget for simple visual search
- -Higher setup time compared to turnkey solutions
Google Vision AI
Google's computer vision API with product search, label detection, and visual similarity capabilities. Offers a dedicated Product Search feature for ecommerce use cases.
Pros
- +Reliable product search with catalog integration
- +Good label and object detection
- +Web entity detection identifies similar images online
- +Integrates with Google Shopping ecosystem
Cons
- -Product Search requires structured catalog upload
- -Limited customization of similarity models
- -Per-image pricing adds up for high-volume queries
- -No cross-modal search capabilities
Clarifai
Full-lifecycle AI platform with strong visual recognition capabilities. Offers pre-built models for image classification, detection, and similarity, plus custom model training.
Pros
- +Wide range of pre-built visual recognition models
- +Custom model training with transfer learning
- +Visual similarity search with metadata filtering
- +Good annotation tools for training data
Cons
- -Platform can feel complex for simple use cases
- -Pricing structure not fully transparent
- -API performance can vary under load
- -Community has shrunk compared to peak years
AWS Rekognition
Amazon's computer vision service with face analysis, label detection, and custom label support. Can be combined with OpenSearch for building visual search applications.
Pros
- +Reliable label and face detection
- +Custom labels for domain-specific recognition
- +Good integration with S3 and Lambda
- +Supports both image and video analysis
Cons
- -No native visual similarity search feature
- -Requires building similarity pipeline with OpenSearch
- -Face analysis capabilities raise privacy concerns
- -Limited pre-built templates for search applications
Algolia Visual Search
Algolia's AI-powered visual search extension that integrates with their existing search infrastructure. Designed for ecommerce with focus on product discovery.
Pros
- +Integrates with Algolia's fast search infrastructure
- +Easy to add visual search to existing Algolia setup
- +Good for ecommerce product discovery
- +Pre-built UI components for search experiences
Cons
- -Requires existing Algolia subscription
- -Limited to ecommerce-style visual search
- -Less flexible than purpose-built visual search APIs
- -Pricing can be high for large catalogs
Frequently Asked Questions
What is visual search and how does it work?
Visual search allows users to find similar items by uploading an image instead of typing a text query. It works by converting images into vector embeddings using models like CLIP or SigLIP, then finding the closest matches in a pre-indexed collection. Modern visual search also supports text-to-image queries where natural language descriptions are used to find matching visuals.
How do I evaluate visual search quality?
Use standard metrics like Precision@K (are the top K results relevant?), Recall@K (what percentage of relevant items are found?), and NDCG (are relevant results ranked higher?). Test with real user queries, not just synthetic benchmarks. A/B testing with click-through rates provides the best signal for ecommerce applications.
Can visual search work for fashion and home decor?
Visual search is particularly effective for fashion and home decor because these categories are inherently visual and hard to describe with text. Features like color, pattern, style, and shape are naturally captured by image embeddings. Fine-tuning on domain-specific data typically improves results by 10-20% over general models.
What is the typical latency for a visual search query?
End-to-end latency (upload image, generate embedding, search, return results) typically ranges from 100-500ms depending on image size, embedding model, and vector database. The embedding generation step is usually the bottleneck. Using optimized models (ONNX, TensorRT) and caching can reduce this to under 200ms.
Ready to Get Started with Mixpeek?
See why teams choose Mixpeek for multimodal AI. Book a demo to explore how our platform can transform your data workflows.
Explore Other Curated Lists
Best Multimodal AI APIs
A hands-on comparison of the top multimodal AI APIs for processing text, images, video, and audio through a single integration. We evaluated latency, modality coverage, retrieval quality, and developer experience.
Best Video Search Tools
We tested the leading video search and understanding platforms on real-world content libraries. This guide covers visual search, scene detection, transcript-based retrieval, and action recognition.
Best AI Content Moderation Tools
We evaluated content moderation platforms across image, video, text, and audio moderation. This guide covers accuracy, latency, customization, and compliance features for trust and safety teams.