Mixpeek Logo

    Cut FDA Audit Prep Time by 90%

    Search across IFUs, recalls, FSNs, and MAUDE reports—including tables, diagrams, and risk matrices—with 92% accuracy. Built for RA, QA, and PMS teams.

    Outperforms GPT-4o, Gemini, and Claude on regulatory documents.

    Benchmarked: IFUs, FDA recalls, FSNs, MAUDE reports, FMEAs, ISO 14971 risk files

    Trusted by Regulatory Affairs, Quality Systems, and Post-Market Surveillance teams navigating FDA audits, EU MDR compliance, and global vigilance workloads.

    Medical Device Document Retriever
    mxp.co/device
    1
    2
    3

    Interactive retriever playground

    Launch Full Retriever

    Multimodal Extraction

    Tables, diagrams, schematics, FMEA matrices, and warning symbols with structural accuracy.

    Diagram-Aware Search

    Find assembly drawings, flowcharts, and schematics by description—not filename.

    Multi-Hop Retrieval

    Link recalls ↔ IFUs ↔ MAUDE events ↔ CAPAs across thousands of documents.

    See It In Action

    From messy IFU PDF to structured, queryable data in seconds.

    Before: Raw IFU PDF

    // Embedded warning section...

    WARNING

    Do not operate device if battery pack shows signs of thermal degradation or swelling.

    // Assembly diagram (figure 3.12)...

    [Assembly Diagram - not searchable]

    // Multi-column layout, headers span rows, no context...

    After: Structured JSON
    {
    "device_name": "X200 Infusion Pump",
    "doc_type": "IFU",
    "manufacturer": "MedTech Inc.",
    "warnings": [
    {
    "text": "Do not operate if battery pack shows thermal degradation",
    "severity": "critical",
    "source": "p.44, section 5.2"
    }
    ],
    "diagrams": [
    {
    "type": "assembly",
    "caption": "Cassette assembly steps",
    "source": "figure 3.12, p.28",
    "searchable": true
    }
    ],
    "related_recalls": ["FDA-2023-1154"],
    "similar_adverse_events": ["MDR-2024-00123"]
    }
    100%
    Source attribution
    Diagrams
    Fully searchable
    Linked
    Cross-doc references
    JSON
    API-ready output

    Capability Benchmarks

    Tested on 500+ IFUs, FSNs, recalls, and 5,000 MAUDE reports. These benchmarks measure regulatory-specific capabilities, not general intelligence.

    Table Extraction

    92.4%
    Cell Accuracy

    Cell-level accuracy extracting FMEA matrices, specification tables, and risk matrices with merged cells and multi-level headers.

    Mixpeek92.4%
    GPT-4 Vision63.1%
    Google Doc AI70.4%
    96.8% header detection
    88.3% merged cell handling
    Full row/column labeling

    Diagram Retrieval

    5.4×
    vs. Text-Only Search

    Improvement over text-only search when retrieving assembly drawings, flowcharts, schematics, and labeled component diagrams.

    Mixpeek (CLIP Hybrid)5.4×
    Vector Only2.1×
    BM25 Only1.0×
    CLIP + BGE fusion
    Caption-aware retrieval
    OCR text extraction

    Retrieval Precision@3

    91%
    Top-3 Accuracy

    Percentage of queries where the correct IFU section, recall, or MAUDE report appears in the top 3 results.

    Mixpeek (Hybrid)91%
    Vector Only78%
    BM25 Only69%
    Hybrid vector + keyword
    Cross-modal fusion
    Regulatory-domain tuning

    These benchmarks test specific regulatory document capabilities. GPT-4 is a better general assistant—we're a better regulatory document parser. Different tools for different jobs.

    How It Works

    Two pipelines working together to transform regulatory documents into answers

    Extraction Pipeline

    📄
    IFUs, Recalls, FSNs
    PDF, DOCX, HTML
    🔍
    Layout Detection
    Tables, Diagrams, Text
    📊
    Structure Extraction
    FMEA, Specs, Warnings
    🧠
    Multimodal Index
    BGE + CLIP Embeddings

    Retrieval Pipeline

    Natural Query
    "battery warnings pump"
    🔀
    Hybrid Search
    Sparse + Dense + CLIP
    🎯
    Cross-Encoder Rerank
    Precision scoring
    Cited Results
    Page, Section, Figure

    Why Generic LLMs Fail at Regulatory Documents

    GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini are great general assistants—but regulated documentation needs specialized extraction.

    ProblemGeneric LLMsMixpeek
    Diagram/figure search
    Cannot retrieve or search diagrams by content
    Full diagram extraction + CLIP hybrid retrieval
    Table structure
    Breaks row/column relationships in FMEA tables
    92.4% cell accuracy with source attribution
    Cross-document linking
    No memory across IFUs, recalls, MAUDE reports
    Multi-hop retrieval linking related documents
    Version control
    Confuses older vs. newer IFU versions
    Version-aware metadata + section diff
    Regulatory language
    Literal keyword matching, misses synonyms
    Semantic, regulatory-domain search
    Risk matrices
    Fails on FMEA severity/probability tables
    Embedded risk tables fully queryable
    Complete coverageAudit-readyCross-doc analysisTraceableSemantic understandingRisk file ready21 CFR Part 11 ready

    Share with Your Team

    Download the 2-page executive brief with ROI model, time savings by activity, and implementation timeline.

    Download PDF

    Use Cases

    Transform how your RA, QA, and PMS teams work with regulatory documentation

    FDA Audit Preparation

    Retrieve all relevant IFU sections, test reports, risk controls, and supporting evidence with a single query. 3-5 days → 2-4 hours.

    CAPA Investigations

    Find similar incidents, related complaints, risk file content, and design documentation instantly across your QMS.

    Adverse Event Correlation

    Identify similar MAUDE events, complaints, and recalls using semantic similarity—not keywords. 91% Precision@3.

    Field Safety Notice Development

    Retrieve all related IFU warnings, historical FSNs, and regulatory precedents when drafting new safety communications.

    Supplier Quality

    Surface recurring supplier-related quality issues through cross-document pattern matching across CAPAs and NCRs.

    Risk Management Files

    Search FMEA tables, risk matrices, and ISO 14971 documentation with full semantic understanding and cell-level accuracy.

    See the full ROI breakdown

    Download the 2-page brief with time savings for each use case.

    90-Second Overview

    🏥

    Product Demo Video

    Coming soon

    Get notified when it's ready

    See how Mixpeek transforms medical device regulatory document intelligence

    Developer Quickstart

    Get started in minutes with our simple API

    from mixpeek import Mixpeek
    client = Mixpeek(api_key="YOUR_API_KEY")
    # Index an IFU document
    response = client.collections.medical_device.index(
    document_id="ifu-x200-pump-v2",
    url="https://example.com/ifu.pdf",
    doc_type="ifu"
    )
    # Query regulatory documents
    results = client.collections.medical_device.query(
    query="battery warnings infusion pump",
    doc_types=["ifu", "recall", "fsn"]
    )
    pip install mixpeekornpm install @mixpeek/sdk

    Ready to Deploy

    Includes ingestion, extraction, multi-hop retrieval, and flexible deployment options. VPC and on-prem available.

    Flexible pricing that scales with your document volume and team size. Custom enterprise plans available for validated environments and dedicated support.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions from RA, QA, and Post-Market Surveillance teams.

    21 CFR Part 11 ready
    Enterprise-ready
    Self-host or cloud
    API-first

    Ready to Transform Your Regulatory Documentation Workflow?

    Start searching across IFUs, recalls, FSNs, and MAUDE reports in minutes—with diagrams, tables, and cross-document linking.