Best NSFW Detection APIs in 2026
We evaluated leading NSFW and content moderation APIs on detection accuracy, category granularity, and false positive rates. This guide covers image and video safety classification for platforms handling user-generated content.
Most video NSFW moderation here is frame-sampling, which misses brief or fast-cut content. Mixpeek runs scene-level moderation across video, audio, and image with tunable per-category thresholds and explainable evidence for review queues — self-hosted or managed.
See scene-level moderation on MixpeekQuick Answer
The best overall option in this category is Hive Moderation, especially for social platforms and marketplaces needing the deepest content categorization. The rankings below compare each tool by strengths, limitations, pricing, and fit for production use.
Hive Moderation
Best for social platforms and marketplaces needing the deepest content categorization.
Amazon Rekognition Content Moderation
Best for aws teams adding content moderation to existing media workflows.
Google Cloud Vision SafeSearch
Best for quick image safety checks with minimal integration complexity.
Skip the comparison? Mixpeek runs NSFW detection on your own data: extraction, indexing, and search in one platform.
How We Evaluated
Detection Accuracy
True positive rate for explicit content detection while minimizing false positives on safe content.
Category Granularity
Specificity of content categories beyond binary safe/unsafe, including violence, drugs, hate symbols, and suggestive content.
Modality Coverage
Support for images, video frames, text, and audio content moderation in a unified service.
Latency & Scale
Response time for real-time moderation and throughput for batch processing of content libraries.
Overview
Hive Moderation
Dedicated content moderation platform with industry-leading category depth, 50+ granular classes across nudity, violence, drugs, weapons, hate symbols, self-harm, and more. Covers images, video, text, and audio in a unified API. Used by major social platforms for at-scale moderation with low false positive rates.
Unmatched category depth with 50+ granular content classes, enabling nuanced policy enforcement that goes far beyond binary safe/unsafe decisions.
Strengths
- +Industry-leading 50+ category granularity (nudity subtypes, drug paraphernalia, etc.)
- +Covers images, video, text, and audio in one platform
- +Low false positive rates with per-category tunable thresholds
- +Pre-built models for drugs, weapons, hate symbols, self-harm, and more
Limitations
- -Pricing higher than hyperscaler alternatives ($0.001-$0.005/image)
- -No self-hosted deployment option, cloud API only
- -Enterprise-focused sales process; no public free tier
- -Custom category training requires dedicated engagement
Real-World Use Cases
- •Social media platforms screening millions of daily user uploads for policy violations across nudity, violence, and hate speech
- •Online marketplaces filtering product listings that contain prohibited items like weapons, drugs, or counterfeit goods
- •Dating apps enforcing profile photo guidelines by detecting explicit content with fine-grained nudity subtypes
- •Ad tech platforms pre-screening creative assets to ensure brand safety before serving ads alongside user content
Choose This When
When your platform needs to distinguish between dozens of content violation types, such as differentiating suggestive content from explicit nudity, or drug paraphernalia from weapons, and you need per-category threshold tuning.
Skip This If
When you only need basic safe/unsafe classification and cannot justify the higher per-image cost, or when you need a self-hosted solution for data sovereignty requirements.
Integration Example
import requests
response = requests.post(
"https://api.thehive.ai/api/v2/task/sync",
headers={"Authorization": "Token YOUR_API_KEY"},
json={"url": "https://example.com/image.jpg"}
)
result = response.json()
for cls in result["output"][0]["classes"]:
if cls["score"] > 0.8:
print(f"{cls['class']}: {cls['score']:.3f}")Amazon Rekognition Content Moderation
AWS content moderation API that detects explicit, suggestive, and violent content in images and videos. Returns timestamp-level results for video with hierarchical category labels. Supports custom moderation adapters trained on your specific content policies.
Native AWS ecosystem integration with S3 triggers, Lambda workflows, and compliance certifications (FedRAMP, HIPAA) that no standalone moderation vendor can match.
Strengths
- +Video moderation with frame-level timestamps and confidence scores
- +Custom moderation adapter training for platform-specific policies
- +Deep AWS integration with S3 triggers and Lambda workflows
- +AWS compliance certifications (HIPAA, SOC, FedRAMP)
Limitations
- -Category granularity limited vs. Hive (fewer subcategories)
- -Custom adapters require significant labeled training data
- -No text or audio moderation, images and video only
- -Per-image pricing ($1/1K) costly for high-volume UGC platforms
Real-World Use Cases
- •E-commerce platforms running automated moderation on product images uploaded to S3 via Lambda triggers
- •Video streaming services scanning uploaded content for explicit material with frame-level timestamp reporting
- •Government and healthcare organizations needing FedRAMP/HIPAA-compliant content screening workflows
- •Media companies training custom moderation adapters to enforce platform-specific content guidelines
Choose This When
When your media pipeline already runs on AWS and you need content moderation that plugs directly into S3 events, Lambda, and Step Functions without managing another vendor relationship.
Skip This If
When you need text or audio moderation alongside image/video, or when your content policies require more than the ~20 hierarchical categories Rekognition provides.
Integration Example
import boto3
client = boto3.client("rekognition")
response = client.detect_moderation_labels(
Image={"S3Object": {"Bucket": "my-bucket", "Name": "image.jpg"}},
MinConfidence=70
)
for label in response["ModerationLabels"]:
print(f"{label['Name']}: {label['Confidence']:.1f}%")
if label.get("ParentName"):
print(f" Parent: {label['ParentName']}")Google Cloud Vision SafeSearch
Google's content safety detection classifying images across adult, violence, racy, spoof, and medical categories. Returns likelihood scores (VERY_UNLIKELY to VERY_LIKELY) per category. Simple, reliable, but limited to 5 predefined categories with no customization.
Dead-simple API with clear likelihood-level outputs and seamless integration with the broader Cloud Vision feature set (labels, OCR, face detection) in a single call.
Strengths
- +Simple API with clear 5-level likelihood outputs
- +High accuracy on explicit content from Google's training data
- +Integrated with Cloud Vision labels, OCR, and face detection
- +Reliable at scale with Google Cloud SLAs
Limitations
- -Image-only, no native video or audio moderation
- -Limited to 5 predefined categories (no drugs, weapons, hate symbols)
- -No custom category training or threshold tuning
- -Less granular than Hive or Microsoft Content Safety
Real-World Use Cases
- •Blog and CMS platforms adding a quick safety gate on user-uploaded images before publishing
- •Image hosting services performing initial triage to flag obviously explicit uploads for human review
- •Mobile apps running server-side safety checks on user-generated profile photos and gallery uploads
- •Data labeling pipelines pre-filtering large image datasets to remove explicit content before annotation
Choose This When
When you need a quick, reliable safety check on images and are already on GCP, or when your moderation requirements are straightforward enough that 5 predefined categories suffice.
Skip This If
When you need video moderation, custom content categories, or granular policy enforcement beyond the 5 built-in SafeSearch labels.
Integration Example
from google.cloud import vision
client = vision.ImageAnnotatorClient()
image = vision.Image()
image.source.image_uri = "gs://my-bucket/image.jpg"
response = client.safe_search_detection(image=image)
safe = response.safe_search_annotation
print(f"Adult: {safe.adult.name}")
print(f"Violence: {safe.violence.name}")
print(f"Racy: {safe.racy.name}")Microsoft Azure AI Content Safety
Microsoft's content safety API covering text and images with severity-level scoring (0-7 for text, with the image model returning 0, 2, 4, and 6) across hate, sexual, violence, and self-harm categories. Video is handled by extracting and scanning key frames rather than through a native video endpoint. Includes prompt shield for LLM applications and groundedness detection for AI-generated content.
Severity-level scoring (0-6) across categories plus LLM-specific guardrails like prompt shield and groundedness detection, purpose-built for the AI application era.
Strengths
- +Severity-level scoring (0-6) enables nuanced policy enforcement
- +Multimodal: native text and image moderation, plus frame-based video scanning
- +Prompt shield and groundedness detection for LLM safety
- +Blocklist management for custom terms and patterns
Limitations
- -Fewer categories than Hive (4 main vs. 50+)
- -Azure dependency for production deployment
- -Video analysis relatively new with fewer production references
- -Custom category training more limited than Hive
Real-World Use Cases
- •AI chatbot platforms using prompt shield to detect jailbreak attempts and enforce content policies on LLM outputs
- •Enterprise SaaS apps moderating user-generated text, images, and video within a unified Azure-based pipeline
- •Education platforms enforcing age-appropriate content rules using severity-level thresholds tailored per grade level
- •Gaming companies screening in-game chat, uploaded avatars, and video clips with blocklist management for custom slurs
Choose This When
When you are building AI-powered applications that need both traditional content moderation and LLM safety guardrails, or when severity-level scoring fits your policy enforcement model better than binary flags.
Skip This If
When you need deep category granularity (50+ classes) or when you are not on Azure and adding an Azure dependency is undesirable.
Integration Example
from azure.ai.contentsafety import ContentSafetyClient
from azure.core.credentials import AzureKeyCredential
client = ContentSafetyClient(
"https://<resource>.cognitiveservices.azure.com",
AzureKeyCredential("<key>")
)
from azure.ai.contentsafety.models import AnalyzeImageOptions, ImageData
request = AnalyzeImageOptions(image=ImageData(url="https://example.com/img.jpg"))
response = client.analyze_image(request)
for cat in response.categories_analysis:
print(f"{cat.category}: severity {cat.severity}")Sightengine
Real-time content moderation API specialized in image and video safety. Offers nudity detection, weapon detection, text moderation, and custom checks with fast response times.
Sub-100ms response times make it the fastest content moderation API for real-time use cases where upload latency directly impacts user experience.
Strengths
- +Fast response times under 100ms for images
- +Good nudity and weapon detection accuracy
- +Supports image, video, and text moderation
- +Simple REST API with clear documentation
Limitations
- -Smaller category set than Hive
- -Limited custom model training
- -Video moderation is frame-sampling based
Real-World Use Cases
- •Social apps performing sub-100ms moderation on image uploads so users get instant feedback on rejected content
- •Forums and community platforms screening profile pictures and post attachments for weapons and explicit imagery
- •Live streaming platforms sampling video frames in real time to flag policy violations during broadcasts
Choose This When
When speed is your primary constraint, such as moderating content during upload so users see accept/reject decisions instantly, and you need decent accuracy at an affordable price point.
Skip This If
When you need deep category granularity, custom model training, or native video processing rather than frame sampling.
Integration Example
import requests
params = {
"models": "nudity-2.1,weapon,gore",
"api_user": "YOUR_USER",
"api_secret": "YOUR_SECRET",
"url": "https://example.com/image.jpg"
}
r = requests.get("https://api.sightengine.com/1.0/check.json", params=params)
result = r.json()
print(f"Nudity: {result['nudity']['sexual_activity']}")
print(f"Weapon: {result['weapon']}")Clarifai Content Moderation
General-purpose visual AI platform with pre-built moderation models and the ability to train custom classifiers. Offers a visual workflow builder for combining detection steps and supports images, video, and text moderation with an emphasis on customizability.
Full custom model training and visual workflow builder let you go beyond pre-built categories to create moderation pipelines tailored exactly to your platform's content policy.
Strengths
- +Visual workflow builder for chaining moderation steps
- +Custom model training on your own labeled data
- +Supports images, video, and text moderation
- +Pre-built models cover NSFW, drugs, weapons, and gore
Limitations
- -Jack-of-all-trades platform, moderation is not the sole focus
- -Steeper learning curve due to platform complexity
- -Per-operation pricing can escalate at high volume
- -Slower inference than dedicated moderation APIs like Sightengine
Real-World Use Cases
- •Platforms with unique content policies training custom classifiers on their own labeled violation data
- •Media companies building multi-step moderation workflows that chain NSFW detection with brand-logo recognition
- •Research institutions needing flexible visual AI pipelines that combine moderation with object detection and classification
Choose This When
When off-the-shelf moderation categories do not cover your specific content policy and you need to train custom classifiers on your own labeled data.
Skip This If
When you need a simple, fast moderation API without the overhead of a full visual AI platform, or when you lack the labeled data needed for custom model training.
Integration Example
from clarifai_grpc.channel.clarifai_channel import ClarifaiChannel
from clarifai_grpc.grpc.api import resources_pb2, service_pb2, service_pb2_grpc
channel = ClarifaiChannel.get_grpc_channel()
stub = service_pb2_grpc.V2Stub(channel)
metadata = (("authorization", "Key YOUR_PAT"),)
request = service_pb2.PostModelOutputsRequest(
model_id="moderation-recognition",
inputs=[resources_pb2.Input(
data=resources_pb2.Data(image=resources_pb2.Image(url="https://example.com/img.jpg"))
)]
)
response = stub.PostModelOutputs(request, metadata=metadata)
for concept in response.outputs[0].data.concepts:
print(f"{concept.name}: {concept.value:.3f}")AWS Bedrock Guardrails
Amazon Bedrock's content filtering layer that screens both inputs and outputs of foundation model interactions. Configurable filters for hate, insults, sexual, violence, and misconduct across both text and images, with adjustable strength levels. The standalone ApplyGuardrail API can moderate text and images for any model, including self-hosted and third-party ones. Designed primarily for AI application safety rather than general UGC moderation.
Purpose-built for screening LLM inputs and outputs with configurable strength levels and denied-topic policies, filling a gap that traditional image/video moderation APIs do not address.
Strengths
- +Screens both inputs and outputs of LLM interactions
- +Configurable filter strength (low/medium/high) per category
- +Denied topic policies for custom business rules
- +Word and phrase filters with wildcards for blocklists
Limitations
- -Designed for LLM guardrails; weaker fit than dedicated UGC moderators
- -Only works within the Bedrock ecosystem
- -Category set built for LLM safety, not deep UGC categorization
- -Filters tuned for prompt/response safety rather than general media triage
Real-World Use Cases
- •Enterprise chatbots filtering harmful prompts and toxic model outputs before they reach end users
- •Customer support AI preventing agents from generating content that violates company policies
- •Internal AI tools enforcing denied-topic rules to prevent discussion of competitors or confidential information
Choose This When
When you are building generative AI applications on Bedrock and need configurable content filters on both user prompts and model responses.
Skip This If
When you need image or video moderation, or when your moderation needs extend beyond the Bedrock ecosystem to general UGC platforms.
Integration Example
import boto3
bedrock = boto3.client("bedrock-runtime")
response = bedrock.apply_guardrail(
guardrailIdentifier="my-guardrail-id",
guardrailVersion="1",
source="INPUT",
content=[{"text": {"text": "User message to check"}}]
)
print(f"Action: {response['action']}")
for assessment in response.get("assessments", []):
for policy in assessment.get("contentPolicy", {}).get("filters", []):
print(f" {policy['type']}: {policy['action']}")NudeNet
Open-source nudity detection model available as a Python package and Docker container. Lightweight classifier that detects exposed body parts with bounding boxes. Popular for self-hosted moderation pipelines where data cannot leave the organization's infrastructure.
The only viable fully open-source nudity detection option that runs on CPU, enabling self-hosted moderation for organizations with strict data residency requirements.
Strengths
- +Fully open-source (AGPL license) and self-hostable
- +Lightweight, runs on CPU without GPU requirement
- +Returns bounding boxes for detected regions
- +Active community with regular model updates
Limitations
- -Nudity-focused only, no violence, drugs, weapons, or hate detection
- -Lower accuracy than commercial APIs on edge cases
- -No managed API or cloud service
- -AGPL license requires open-sourcing modifications
Real-World Use Cases
- •Healthcare and legal organizations that cannot send user images to external APIs for compliance reasons
- •Small social platforms adding basic nudity filtering on a limited budget without per-image API costs
- •Content pipelines needing a pre-filter to reduce the volume of images sent to expensive commercial moderation APIs
Choose This When
When you need to run nudity detection entirely on your own infrastructure, either for compliance reasons or to avoid per-image API costs at high volume.
Skip This If
When you need detection beyond nudity (violence, weapons, hate symbols), when you need commercial-grade accuracy on edge cases, or when the AGPL license conflicts with your project.
Integration Example
from nudenet import NudeDetector
detector = NudeDetector()
detections = detector.detect("path/to/image.jpg")
for d in detections:
print(f"{d['class']}: {d['score']:.3f}")
print(f" Box: {d['box']}")
if d["score"] > 0.6:
print(" -> Flagged for review")OpenAI Moderation API
Free content moderation endpoint built around the omni-moderation-latest model. Classifies content across 13 categories including sexual content, hate, violence, self-harm, harassment, and illicit. Primarily a text moderator, but it now also accepts images for the sexual, violence, and self-harm categories. No native audio or video support. Designed for screening LLM inputs and outputs but usable as a general moderation API.
Completely free moderation with no usage limits, covering text plus image input for the sexual, violence, and self-harm categories, making it the zero-cost first-pass option in OpenAI-powered applications.
Strengths
- +Completely free with no usage limits
- +13 content categories with subcategory granularity
- +Fast inference with low latency
- +Simple API, one endpoint, no configuration needed
Limitations
- -Image support is partial (3 categories only); no video or audio moderation
- -Accuracy tuned for LLM content, may underperform on UGC
- -No custom categories or threshold tuning
- -No SLA or support, it is a free, best-effort service
Real-World Use Cases
- •LLM-powered applications screening user prompts before passing them to GPT models
- •Community forums adding free text moderation as a first-pass filter before human review
- •Chatbot developers filtering model outputs to prevent harmful or policy-violating responses
Choose This When
When you need free text moderation with zero setup cost, especially if you are already using the OpenAI API for other features.
Skip This If
When you need image, video, or audio moderation, when you need custom categories, or when you require an SLA for production reliability.
Integration Example
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
response = client.moderations.create(
model="omni-moderation-latest",
input="Text to check for policy violations"
)
result = response.results[0]
if result.flagged:
for cat, flagged in result.categories.dict().items():
if flagged:
score = getattr(result.category_scores, cat)
print(f"{cat}: {score:.4f}")Falconsai NSFW Image Detection
Open-source image classification model hosted on Hugging Face, fine-tuned from Google ViT for binary NSFW/SFW image classification. Lightweight enough to run on CPU with decent accuracy for basic filtering. Popular in hobbyist and self-hosted content pipelines.
The simplest possible NSFW detection, a single Hugging Face model call that returns a binary safe/unsafe score, with zero API keys or vendor accounts required.
Strengths
- +Open-source and free on Hugging Face
- +Simple binary NSFW/SFW classification
- +Small model runs efficiently on CPU
- +Easy integration via Hugging Face transformers library
Limitations
- -Binary classification only, no category granularity
- -Lower accuracy than commercial APIs on borderline content
- -No video or text support
- -No active commercial support or SLA
Real-World Use Cases
- •Prototype applications testing content moderation workflows before committing to a commercial API
- •Personal media servers adding basic NSFW filtering to photo libraries
- •Research projects needing a free baseline NSFW classifier for dataset cleaning
Choose This When
When you need a quick, free NSFW filter for prototyping, personal projects, or dataset cleaning and do not need production-grade accuracy or category depth.
Skip This If
When you need production reliability, granular content categories, video support, or accuracy on borderline and adversarial content.
Integration Example
from transformers import pipeline
classifier = pipeline(
"image-classification",
model="Falconsai/nsfw_image_detection"
)
result = classifier("path/to/image.jpg")
for label in result:
print(f"{label['label']}: {label['score']:.4f}")Webpurify
Hybrid content moderation service combining AI detection with human review. Offers image, video, and text moderation with the option to escalate borderline cases to trained human moderators for final decisions. Focuses on reducing false positives through the human-in-the-loop approach.
The hybrid AI-plus-human approach provides the lowest false positive rates in the industry, with trained moderators making final calls on ambiguous content.
Strengths
- +Human-in-the-loop review for borderline cases reduces false positives
- +Covers image, video, text, and live streaming moderation
- +Custom moderation guidelines tailored to your platform rules
- +24/7 human review teams across multiple time zones
Limitations
- -Human review adds latency (minutes to hours vs. milliseconds)
- -Higher cost per item than pure AI solutions
- -Throughput limited by human reviewer availability
- -Less predictable pricing at scale due to human labor costs
Real-World Use Cases
- •Children's platforms and educational apps where false negatives carry significant legal and reputational risk
- •Brand-sensitive marketplaces escalating borderline product listings to human moderators before removal
- •Live streaming platforms combining real-time AI flags with human review for final enforcement decisions
Choose This When
When the cost of a false positive (wrongly removing safe content) or false negative (missing harmful content) is high enough to justify human review, such as children's platforms or legally sensitive contexts.
Skip This If
When you need sub-second moderation decisions, when your volume is too high for human review economics, or when a pure AI solution provides sufficient accuracy for your use case.
Integration Example
import requests
response = requests.get("https://im-api1.webpurify.com/services/rest/", params={
"api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY",
"method": "webpurify.aim.imgcheck",
"imgurl": "https://example.com/image.jpg",
"format": "json"
})
result = response.json()
nudity_score = result["rsp"]["nudity"]
print(f"Nudity score: {nudity_score}")
if float(nudity_score) > 70:
print("Flagged, escalating to human review")Put NSFW detection to work
Connect a bucket and Mixpeek runs the whole NSFW detection pipeline for you: extraction, indexing, and search over your own objects. No models to wire up, nothing to host.
Start with ManagedAlready have vectors?
Keep your embeddings on your own cloud and run dense, sparse, and BM25 search directly on object storage. First 1M vectors free.
Start with MVSFrequently Asked Questions
How accurate are NSFW detection APIs?
Top APIs achieve 95-99% accuracy for detecting explicit content, but false positive rates vary significantly. The key metric is the balance between catching harmful content and not over-moderating safe content. Always test with content representative of your platform and tune confidence thresholds accordingly.
Can NSFW detection work on video content?
Yes, most services support video moderation either through frame sampling (extracting frames at intervals) or native video processing. Frame sampling is faster but may miss brief explicit content. Platforms like Mixpeek and Amazon Rekognition process videos natively with frame-level timestamps.
What categories beyond nudity do content moderation APIs detect?
Modern APIs detect violence, weapons, drugs, hate symbols, self-harm, gore, suggestive content, gambling, and more. Hive Moderation offers 50+ categories. Most platforms allow you to set different thresholds per category to match your platform's content policy.
Should I use an open-source NSFW model or a commercial API?
Open-source models like NudeNet and Falconsai are viable for basic nudity filtering and prototyping, but they lack the category depth, accuracy on edge cases, and ongoing model updates that commercial APIs provide. Use open-source for prototyping, self-hosted requirements, or as a pre-filter to reduce volume before calling a commercial API. Use commercial APIs when accuracy, category granularity, and reliability matter for production.
How do I handle LLM content safety alongside traditional content moderation?
AI applications need both traditional content moderation for user uploads and LLM-specific guardrails for prompt injection and toxic model outputs. Microsoft Azure AI Content Safety and AWS Bedrock Guardrails offer purpose-built LLM safety features, and both can now screen images as well as text. OpenAI's free Moderation API handles text and, for a few categories, images. For comprehensive coverage, combine a traditional moderation API for images and video with an LLM guardrail service for text interactions.
How is video moderation different from image moderation?
Most services moderate video by sampling frames at an interval and running image classification on each one, then aggregating the results. This is cheaper and faster than analyzing every frame, but the tradeoff is real: explicit content that appears only briefly, or between your sampled frames, can be missed. If brief violations matter for your platform, raise the sampling rate or pick a service with native video processing such as Amazon Rekognition, which returns frame-level timestamps. Either way, treat your sampling interval as a tunable policy parameter and validate it against clips that resemble your real content.
Should I self-host a moderation model or use an API for sensitive content?
Use a hosted API when you want to ship fast and benefit from models the vendor keeps updated. Self-host (for example NudeNet or the Falconsai model) when data residency or compliance rules forbid sending user images to a third party, or when per-image API costs are prohibitive at your volume. A common middle ground is to run a cheap self-hosted model as a pre-filter and only send borderline cases to a more accurate commercial API. One firm rule: for any content that could be child sexual abuse material, do not build a homegrown detector or retain the files. Route to established hash-matching programs and the legally required reporting channels.
See how Mixpeek handles this
Purpose-built for nsfw detection apis — not bolted on.
AI Content Moderation
Mixpeek's dedicated page for this capability — architecture, benchmarks, and how it works.
Talk to a Mixpeek engineer — free
30 minutes. Bring your use case and we'll tell you exactly what would work and what wouldn't.
Explore Other Curated Lists
Best AI Content Moderation Tools
We evaluated content moderation platforms across image, video, text, and audio moderation. This guide covers accuracy, latency, customization, and compliance features for trust and safety teams.
Best Document AI Platforms
A hands-on evaluation of platforms for intelligent document processing, including OCR, layout analysis, table extraction, and document search. Tested on invoices, contracts, and technical manuals.
Best Audio Processing & Search Tools
An evaluation of platforms for audio transcription, analysis, and search. We tested on podcasts, call recordings, music, and environmental audio across multiple languages.