Best S3-Compatible Object Storage for AI Workloads in 2026
We tested 7 S3-compatible object storage providers for AI and ML workloads — measuring throughput, latency, cost per TB, and compatibility with vector databases and embedding pipelines. Every provider tested with MVS (Mixpeek Vector Store), which runs on any S3-compatible backend.
Mixpeek Vector Store (MVS) runs on any S3-compatible backend — layer vector search directly on top of your existing object storage without moving data.
Try Mixpeek StorageHow We Evaluated
Cost per TB
Storage cost, egress fees, and API request pricing. For AI workloads, egress and GET request costs often dominate — not just storage.
S3 Compatibility
Completeness of S3 API support. Tested multipart uploads, presigned URLs, lifecycle policies, and compatibility with MVS, MinIO, and boto3.
Performance
Upload throughput, download latency, and time-to-first-byte for large objects (embeddings, model weights, media files).
AI Ecosystem Fit
Integration with AI tools: works as a backend for vector databases (MVS, LanceDB), model registries, dataset versioning, and training pipelines.
Operational Simplicity
Setup time, dashboard quality, documentation, and support responsiveness.
Overview
Backblaze B2
The best balance of cost, reliability, and S3 compatibility for AI workloads. B2 is 1/4 the price of AWS S3 with free egress to Cloudflare and Fastly CDN partners. Tested as an MVS backend — Mixpeek's vector store runs directly on B2, giving you vector search on top of your existing B2 storage without moving data.
Lowest cost per TB of any mainstream provider with free CDN egress via Bandwidth Alliance — making it the default choice for storage-heavy AI workloads that serve data through Cloudflare.
Strengths
- +Cheapest mainstream storage at $6/TB/mo (vs $23/TB on S3)
- +Free egress to Cloudflare, Fastly, and other CDN partners
- +Full S3 compatibility — works with MVS, boto3, rclone, everything
- +Proven reliability (500B+ objects stored) with 11 nines durability
Limitations
- -Single-region only (US-West-004 or EU-Central-003)
- -No serverless compute integration like Lambda@Edge
- -Rate limits on free egress via CDN partners
- -Smaller ecosystem than AWS for adjacent services
Real-World Use Cases
- •Storing and serving 100M+ embedding vectors via MVS with sub-$1K/mo storage costs
- •Backing up model checkpoints during distributed training with free CDN egress for model serving
- •Hosting large multimodal datasets (images, video, audio) for feature extraction pipelines
- •Building a cost-effective RAG knowledge base with vector search layered on top via Mixpeek
Choose This When
When your AI workload is storage-heavy (tens of TB of embeddings, datasets, or model artifacts) and you want the lowest possible cost without sacrificing S3 compatibility or durability.
Skip This If
When you need multi-region replication, serverless compute triggers on storage events, or your workload requires sub-10ms access latency that only block storage can deliver.
Integration Example
import boto3
b2 = boto3.client(
"s3",
endpoint_url="https://s3.us-west-004.backblazeb2.com",
aws_access_key_id="YOUR_B2_KEY_ID",
aws_secret_access_key="YOUR_B2_APP_KEY",
)
# Upload embeddings file to B2
b2.upload_file("my-ai-bucket", "embeddings/batch_001.parquet", "/tmp/batch_001.parquet")
# Generate presigned URL for model weight download
url = b2.generate_presigned_url(
"get_object",
Params={"Bucket": "my-ai-bucket", "Key": "models/v2/weights.safetensors"},
ExpiresIn=3600,
)Cloudflare R2
Zero egress fees — period. R2 is the strongest choice for read-heavy AI workloads (retrieval, inference serving, RAG) where egress costs would otherwise dominate your bill. Fully S3-compatible and works as an MVS backend for BYO vector search.
Zero egress fees with no caps, no reasonable-use policies, and no CDN partner requirements — the only provider where read-heavy workloads do not incur transfer costs regardless of volume.
Strengths
- +Zero egress fees — game-changing for retrieval-heavy workloads
- +Workers integration for serverless compute at the edge
- +Full S3 API compatibility — tested with MVS, LanceDB, DuckDB
- +Automatic multi-region replication
Limitations
- -$15/TB/mo storage — more expensive than B2 or Wasabi
- -No lifecycle policies for automatic tiering (yet)
- -Rate limits on free tier (10M reads/mo, 1M writes/mo)
- -Less mature than S3 for large-scale batch operations
Real-World Use Cases
- •Serving model weights to inference endpoints across multiple regions without egress penalties
- •Hosting a RAG document store where every retrieval query pulls data — zero egress keeps costs flat
- •Running edge AI inference with Cloudflare Workers reading model artifacts from R2
- •Building a global image search API where search results serve original media from R2 at zero transfer cost
Choose This When
When your AI workload reads far more data than it writes — retrieval, inference serving, RAG, or any pattern where egress would be your largest cost on other providers.
Skip This If
When you need versioning, object lock, or lifecycle tiering — R2 lacks these features. Also avoid if storage volume is very large and access is infrequent, since $15/TB/mo storage cost exceeds cheaper alternatives.
Integration Example
import boto3
r2 = boto3.client(
"s3",
endpoint_url="https://YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID.r2.cloudflarestorage.com",
aws_access_key_id="YOUR_R2_ACCESS_KEY",
aws_secret_access_key="YOUR_R2_SECRET_KEY",
)
# Upload training data — zero egress when models pull it later
r2.upload_file("ai-data", "datasets/train.parquet", "/tmp/train.parquet")
# List model artifacts
response = r2.list_objects_v2(Bucket="ai-data", Prefix="models/v3/")
for obj in response.get("Contents", []):
print(f"{obj['Key']} — {obj['Size'] / 1e9:.1f} GB")AWS S3
The default choice and the most battle-tested object storage on the planet. Unmatched ecosystem integration (Lambda, SageMaker, Bedrock, S3 Vectors). Higher cost than alternatives but offers capabilities nobody else has — including native S3 Vectors for vector search directly in your bucket.
The deepest ecosystem integration of any cloud provider — Lambda triggers, SageMaker pipelines, Bedrock model hosting, Athena analytics, and S3 Vectors all work natively with S3 without additional infrastructure.
Strengths
- +Deepest ecosystem integration — Lambda, SageMaker, Bedrock, EMR
- +S3 Vectors: native vector search within S3 (new, ~100ms latency)
- +Intelligent Tiering automates hot/cold lifecycle
- +11 nines durability with cross-region replication
Limitations
- -$23/TB/mo storage — 4x more expensive than B2
- -Egress fees add up fast ($90/TB)
- -S3 Vectors still limited (no hybrid search, no filtering)
- -Complexity tax: IAM policies, VPC endpoints, encryption configs
Real-World Use Cases
- •End-to-end ML pipelines with SageMaker reading training data from S3 and writing model artifacts back
- •Event-driven feature extraction using S3 event notifications triggering Lambda or Step Functions
- •Using S3 Vectors for lightweight vector similarity search without deploying a separate vector database
- •Multi-tier storage for ML artifacts — hot models on Standard, archived checkpoints on Glacier
Choose This When
When you are already invested in AWS and need tight integration with SageMaker, Lambda, or Bedrock — or when you need advanced features like S3 Vectors, Intelligent Tiering, or cross-region replication.
Skip This If
When cost is the primary concern — S3 is 4x more expensive than B2 for storage and egress fees compound quickly on read-heavy workloads. Avoid for large-scale storage-only use cases where ecosystem integration is not needed.
Integration Example
import boto3
s3 = boto3.client("s3")
# Upload training dataset with Intelligent Tiering
s3.upload_file(
"/tmp/dataset.parquet",
"ml-pipeline",
"datasets/v2/train.parquet",
ExtraArgs={"StorageClass": "INTELLIGENT_TIERING"},
)
# Set up event notification for new uploads
s3.put_bucket_notification_configuration(
Bucket="ml-pipeline",
NotificationConfiguration={
"LambdaFunctionConfigurations": [{
"LambdaFunctionArn": "arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:123:function:process-upload",
"Events": ["s3:ObjectCreated:*"],
"Filter": {"Key": {"FilterRules": [{"Name": "prefix", "Value": "datasets/"}]}},
}]
},
)Tigris
Globally distributed, S3-compatible object storage built on FoundationDB. Data automatically replicates to the region closest to your users. Newest entrant on this list but technically impressive — designed from scratch for modern workloads.
Automatic global data distribution with strong consistency — data is replicated to edge locations based on access patterns without any manual configuration or multi-region setup.
Strengths
- +Automatic global distribution — data follows your users
- +Zero egress within the Tigris network
- +S3-compatible API works with MVS, boto3, and standard tools
- +Built on FoundationDB for strong consistency guarantees
Limitations
- -Newest provider — less production track record
- -Pricing still evolving as they scale
- -Smaller community and fewer integrations than S3 or R2
- -No equivalent to S3 lifecycle policies yet
Real-World Use Cases
- •Serving ML model weights globally with automatic edge caching — no manual replication to each region
- •Multi-region RAG deployments where embedding retrieval must be low-latency regardless of user location
- •Distributed training pipelines that need strongly consistent access to shared datasets across regions
Choose This When
When you deploy AI inference endpoints in multiple regions and need model weights and data close to each endpoint without managing cross-region replication yourself.
Skip This If
When you need a battle-tested provider with years of production track record, or when your workload is single-region and does not benefit from global distribution.
Integration Example
import boto3
tigris = boto3.client(
"s3",
endpoint_url="https://fly.storage.tigris.dev",
aws_access_key_id="YOUR_TIGRIS_ACCESS_KEY",
aws_secret_access_key="YOUR_TIGRIS_SECRET_KEY",
)
# Upload model weights — auto-replicated to nearest edge
tigris.upload_file("ai-models", "llm/v3/weights.safetensors", "/tmp/weights.safetensors")
# Data is automatically cached at the edge closest to readers
obj = tigris.get_object(Bucket="ai-models", Key="llm/v3/weights.safetensors")
print(f"Content-Length: {obj['ContentLength'] / 1e9:.1f} GB")Wasabi
Hot cloud storage at cold storage prices. Wasabi positions itself as a drop-in S3 replacement with no egress fees and no API request fees. Straightforward pricing makes cost predictable — you pay for storage and nothing else.
Completely flat-rate pricing with no egress or API fees — the only provider where total cost equals storage price times volume, with no variable components to track or optimize.
Strengths
- +No egress fees and no API request fees
- +Predictable flat-rate pricing at $6.99/TB/mo
- +Full S3 API compatibility
- +Good for bulk storage of embeddings and training data
Limitations
- -90-day minimum storage duration — early deletion fees apply
- -Higher latency than S3 or R2 in our benchmarks
- -No serverless compute integration
- -Limited lifecycle automation compared to S3 Intelligent Tiering
Real-World Use Cases
- •Long-term archival of training datasets that rarely change — the 90-day minimum is irrelevant for static data
- •Storing pre-computed embedding collections that are written once and read many times
- •Backing up model checkpoints from training runs where predictable cost matters more than retrieval speed
Choose This When
When you store large volumes of static or write-once data (training datasets, embedding archives, model backups) and want zero surprises on your monthly bill.
Skip This If
When your data has high churn — frequent uploads, overwrites, or deletions within 90 days will trigger minimum retention charges that can double your effective cost.
Integration Example
import boto3
wasabi = boto3.client(
"s3",
endpoint_url="https://s3.wasabisys.com",
aws_access_key_id="YOUR_WASABI_KEY",
aws_secret_access_key="YOUR_WASABI_SECRET",
)
# Upload large training dataset — flat rate, no egress fees on reads
wasabi.upload_file("ml-datasets", "imagenet/train.tar", "/tmp/imagenet_train.tar")
# Verify upload
head = wasabi.head_object(Bucket="ml-datasets", Key="imagenet/train.tar")
print(f"Uploaded: {head['ContentLength'] / 1e9:.1f} GB")MinIO
Self-hosted, S3-compatible object storage that runs on your own hardware or VMs. The standard choice for air-gapped, on-prem, or regulated environments where data cannot leave your infrastructure. Works as an MVS backend for private-cloud vector search.
The only production-grade, fully S3-compatible object storage you can run entirely on your own infrastructure — critical for air-gapped, regulated, or sovereignty-sensitive AI deployments.
Strengths
- +Self-hosted — full control over data residency and security
- +S3-compatible with excellent ecosystem support
- +High throughput on dedicated hardware (100+ Gbps benchmarks)
- +Open-source with active development
Limitations
- -You manage everything: hardware, upgrades, monitoring, backups
- -No managed offering — operational overhead is real
- -Cost advantage disappears at small scale (hardware amortization)
- -Requires Kubernetes or bare-metal expertise
Real-World Use Cases
- •Air-gapped ML environments in defense or healthcare where training data cannot leave the network perimeter
- •On-prem GPU cluster with local MinIO storing training data for zero-network-hop data loading
- •Self-hosted MVS deployment for private vector search over sensitive embeddings
- •Local development and CI/CD environments that need S3-compatible storage without cloud dependencies
Choose This When
When data sovereignty, air-gap requirements, or regulatory compliance mandate that data stays on your own infrastructure, and you have the ops team to manage it.
Skip This If
When you lack dedicated infrastructure or Kubernetes expertise — the operational burden of managing storage durability, backups, and upgrades yourself is significant at any scale.
Integration Example
import boto3
minio = boto3.client(
"s3",
endpoint_url="http://minio.internal:9000",
aws_access_key_id="minioadmin",
aws_secret_access_key="minioadmin",
)
# Create bucket for ML artifacts
minio.create_bucket(Bucket="ml-artifacts")
# Upload model weights to self-hosted storage
minio.upload_file("ml-artifacts", "models/resnet50.pt", "/tmp/resnet50.pt")
# Set up event notification for new data ingestion
minio.put_bucket_notification_configuration(
Bucket="ml-artifacts",
NotificationConfiguration={
"QueueConfigurations": [{
"QueueArn": "arn:minio:sqs::1:webhook",
"Events": ["s3:ObjectCreated:*"],
}]
},
)Google Cloud Storage (GCS)
Google's object storage with strong ML ecosystem integration (Vertex AI, BigQuery). Autoclass automatically moves objects between storage tiers. A solid choice for teams building on Google Cloud, but pricier than B2 or R2 for storage-heavy AI workloads.
Deepest integration with Google's ML ecosystem — Vertex AI, BigQuery, Dataflow, and TPU training all read from GCS natively without additional data movement or connector setup.
Strengths
- +Tight Vertex AI and BigQuery integration
- +Autoclass handles lifecycle tiering automatically
- +Strong consistency guarantees
- +S3-compatible interoperability API available
Limitations
- -$20/TB/mo (Standard) — expensive for large datasets
- -Egress fees ($0.12/GB) are the highest on this list
- -S3 compatibility layer has gaps (no multipart presigned URLs)
- -Less cost-competitive than B2, R2, or Wasabi for pure storage
Real-World Use Cases
- •Vertex AI training pipelines reading datasets directly from GCS with native integration
- •BigQuery ML workflows that query structured data alongside unstructured media stored in GCS
- •Autoclass-managed storage for mixed-access ML artifacts — hot models tier up, cold checkpoints tier down automatically
Choose This When
When your ML infrastructure runs on Google Cloud and you want native integration with Vertex AI, BigQuery, or TPU training without managing cross-cloud data transfers.
Skip This If
When cost is a primary concern — GCS has the highest egress fees ($0.12/GB) of any provider on this list, and storage at $20/TB/mo is 3x more than B2.
Integration Example
from google.cloud import storage
client = storage.Client()
bucket = client.bucket("ml-training-data")
# Upload training dataset with Autoclass tiering
blob = bucket.blob("datasets/v3/train.parquet")
blob.upload_from_filename("/tmp/train.parquet")
# Generate signed URL for model download
url = blob.generate_signed_url(
version="v4",
expiration=3600,
method="GET",
)
print(f"Download URL: {url[:80]}...")Hetzner Object Storage
The quiet cost leader for EU-based AI teams. Hetzner offers S3-compatible storage at $5.20/TB/mo with full versioning and object lock. EU-only regions (Germany, Finland) make it a strong fit for GDPR-sensitive ML workloads where data residency is not optional.
The cheapest S3-compatible provider that includes versioning and object lock, with EU-only data residency that satisfies GDPR requirements by design rather than by policy.
Strengths
- +Just $5.20/TB/mo — cheapest provider with full S3 features
- +Versioning, object lock, and lifecycle policies included
- +EU-only regions ideal for GDPR compliance
- +Transparent, no-surprise pricing
Limitations
- -EU-only — no North American or APAC regions
- -Smaller community than AWS or Cloudflare ecosystems
- -No CDN integration or edge caching built in
- -Less mature tooling and documentation than hyperscalers
Real-World Use Cases
- •GDPR-compliant storage for medical imaging or biometric datasets that must remain within the EU
- •Budget ML training data storage for European research labs and universities
- •Hosting embedding collections for EU-deployed RAG applications with strict data residency requirements
Choose This When
When you need affordable, fully-featured S3 storage with guaranteed EU data residency for GDPR-sensitive AI workloads.
Skip This If
When you need storage in North America, APAC, or any region outside Germany and Finland, or when you require a large ecosystem of adjacent cloud services.
Integration Example
import boto3
hetzner = boto3.client(
"s3",
endpoint_url="https://fsn1.your-objectstorage.com",
aws_access_key_id="YOUR_HETZNER_KEY",
aws_secret_access_key="YOUR_HETZNER_SECRET",
)
# Upload dataset with versioning enabled
hetzner.put_bucket_versioning(
Bucket="eu-ml-data",
VersioningConfiguration={"Status": "Enabled"},
)
hetzner.upload_file("eu-ml-data", "datasets/train.parquet", "/tmp/train.parquet")Storj
Decentralized object storage built on a global network of independent node operators. Data is encrypted, split into erasure-coded pieces, and distributed across thousands of nodes worldwide. At $4/TB/mo with $7/TB egress, it is one of the cheapest options — and the decentralized architecture provides inherent redundancy without relying on a single cloud provider.
Decentralized storage across thousands of independent nodes with end-to-end encryption — no single point of failure and no single entity controls your data.
Strengths
- +Just $4/TB/mo storage — among the cheapest on any list
- +Decentralized architecture distributes data across thousands of independent nodes
- +End-to-end encryption by default — data is encrypted before leaving your machine
- +S3-compatible gateway works with standard tools and SDKs
Limitations
- -Higher latency than centralized providers for time-to-first-byte
- -Throughput varies depending on node availability and network conditions
- -Less mature S3 compatibility — some advanced features missing
- -Smaller ecosystem and less enterprise adoption than mainstream providers
Real-World Use Cases
- •Archiving petabytes of training data at minimal cost with inherent geographic redundancy
- •Storing encrypted embedding backups where security and cost matter more than retrieval speed
- •Distributing large open-source ML datasets with built-in content delivery
Choose This When
When you need the cheapest possible storage for large-scale archival of ML data and can tolerate higher latency, or when you want inherent geographic redundancy without trusting a single cloud provider.
Skip This If
When you need low-latency access for real-time inference, predictable throughput for training pipelines, or enterprise SLAs with guaranteed uptime and support.
Integration Example
import boto3
storj = boto3.client(
"s3",
endpoint_url="https://gateway.storjshare.io",
aws_access_key_id="YOUR_STORJ_ACCESS_KEY",
aws_secret_access_key="YOUR_STORJ_SECRET_KEY",
)
# Upload training data — encrypted and distributed automatically
storj.upload_file("ml-archive", "datasets/train_v5.tar.gz", "/tmp/train_v5.tar.gz")
# Data is erasure-coded across 80+ nodes for durability
head = storj.head_object(Bucket="ml-archive", Key="datasets/train_v5.tar.gz")
print(f"Stored: {head['ContentLength'] / 1e9:.1f} GB (encrypted, distributed)")IDrive e2
Hot cloud storage from IDrive at $4/TB/mo with no minimum retention and no egress fees up to a reasonable-use threshold. A straightforward option for AI teams that need cheap S3-compatible storage without the 90-day trap that Wasabi imposes.
Same $4/TB/mo price point as Storj and Wasabi but without Wasabi's 90-day minimum retention or Storj's latency variability — the most straightforward budget option.
Strengths
- +Just $4/TB/mo with no minimum retention period
- +Free egress (reasonable-use policy, similar to Wasabi but without 90-day lock)
- +S3-compatible API works with standard tools
- +Multiple regions including US, EU, and APAC
Limitations
- -Reasonable-use egress policy limits heavy download workloads
- -Less known brand with smaller community and fewer integrations
- -Documentation is less thorough than major providers
- -No event notifications or serverless compute integrations
Real-World Use Cases
- •Storing iterating-quickly datasets that get replaced frequently — no early deletion penalties
- •Budget embedding storage for research teams and startups that cannot afford $15-23/TB/mo
- •Backing up ML experiment artifacts where cost predictability matters but data churn is high
Choose This When
When you need the cheapest S3 storage with no gotchas — no minimum retention, no surprising egress caps — and can tolerate a smaller provider ecosystem.
Skip This If
When you need enterprise SLAs, rich documentation, or a large ecosystem of integrations — IDrive e2 is a smaller player with less community support than B2 or R2.
Integration Example
import boto3
idrive = boto3.client(
"s3",
endpoint_url="https://YOUR_REGION.idrivee2.com",
aws_access_key_id="YOUR_IDRIVE_KEY",
aws_secret_access_key="YOUR_IDRIVE_SECRET",
)
# Upload dataset — no minimum retention, delete anytime
idrive.upload_file("experiments", "run-42/embeddings.npy", "/tmp/embeddings.npy")
# Clean up old experiment data without early-deletion penalties
idrive.delete_object(Bucket="experiments", Key="run-41/embeddings.npy")Vultr Object Storage
Developer-friendly S3-compatible storage from Vultr with 17 global locations and a straightforward $5/250GB pricing model. Pairs well with Vultr GPU instances for co-located ML workloads where storage and compute sit on the same network.
Co-located with Vultr's GPU cloud instances across 17 regions — the lowest-latency option for teams already running ML inference on Vultr hardware.
Strengths
- +17 global locations for low-latency access near Vultr GPU instances
- +Simple pricing starting at $5/mo for 250 GB + 1 TB transfer
- +S3-compatible API works with boto3 and standard tooling
- +Co-located with Vultr GPU cloud for minimal data transfer latency
Limitations
- -5 GB max object size — cannot store large model weights as single objects
- -Limited to Vultr's ecosystem — no Lambda-style compute triggers
- -No versioning or object lock support
- -Smaller storage capacity per account compared to hyperscalers
Real-World Use Cases
- •Co-locating model artifacts with Vultr A100 GPU instances for zero-hop model loading
- •Storing inference results and logs from Vultr-hosted ML services
- •Small-to-medium dataset hosting for GPU-powered training runs on Vultr infrastructure
Choose This When
When you run ML workloads on Vultr GPU instances and want co-located storage to minimize data transfer latency and cost.
Skip This If
When you need to store objects larger than 5 GB (model weights, video datasets), require versioning or object lock, or are not already on Vultr infrastructure.
Integration Example
import boto3
vultr = boto3.client(
"s3",
endpoint_url="https://ewr1.vultrobjects.com",
aws_access_key_id="YOUR_VULTR_KEY",
aws_secret_access_key="YOUR_VULTR_SECRET",
)
# Upload model to co-located storage near GPU instance
vultr.upload_file("ml-models", "yolo/v8/weights.pt", "/tmp/yolov8.pt")
# Download to GPU instance on same network — minimal latency
vultr.download_file("ml-models", "yolo/v8/weights.pt", "/tmp/yolov8_local.pt")Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use object storage as a backend for a vector database?
Yes — this is exactly what MVS (Mixpeek Vector Store) does. MVS stores vectors and metadata on any S3-compatible object storage (B2, R2, S3, Tigris, Wasabi, MinIO) and serves hybrid search (dense + sparse + BM25) on top. Hot data is cached for ~8ms queries; warm data is served from object storage at ~92ms. This means your vector database costs are mostly just your storage bill, not a separate database subscription.
What is the cheapest S3-compatible storage for AI workloads?
Backblaze B2 at $6/TB/mo is the cheapest for storage-heavy workloads with moderate egress (especially with free CDN egress). Cloudflare R2 at $15/TB/mo is cheapest for read-heavy workloads because egress is free. Wasabi at $6.99/TB/mo is cheapest for predictable flat-rate pricing with no API fees. The right answer depends on your access pattern: if you read a lot (retrieval, RAG), R2 wins on total cost; if you store a lot and read less, B2 wins.
Is MinIO a good alternative to AWS S3?
MinIO is an excellent S3 alternative for self-hosted and on-prem deployments. It offers full S3 API compatibility, high throughput on dedicated hardware, and complete data sovereignty. The trade-off is operational overhead: you manage hardware, upgrades, and backups yourself. For cloud workloads, Backblaze B2 or Cloudflare R2 offer the same S3 compatibility with zero ops at lower cost than S3.
What is the best object storage for storing embeddings and model weights?
For embeddings: use any S3-compatible storage paired with MVS, which adds vector search on top. Backblaze B2 is the most cost-effective for large embedding collections. For model weights: Cloudflare R2 is ideal because zero egress means you can pull weights to any region without transfer fees. For training data: Wasabi's flat-rate pricing with no API fees keeps costs predictable during data-intensive training runs.
How does object storage compare to block storage for AI workloads?
Object storage (S3, B2, R2) is 5-10x cheaper per TB than block storage (EBS, Persistent Disks) and scales to exabytes without provisioning. The trade-off is higher latency: ~50-100ms for object storage vs ~1-5ms for block storage. For AI workloads, object storage is the right choice for embeddings, datasets, and model artifacts. Use block storage only for the hot serving layer (like Qdrant or the warm cache in MVS) where sub-10ms latency is critical.
Ready to Get Started with Mixpeek?
See why teams choose Mixpeek for multimodal AI. Book a demo to explore how our platform can transform your data workflows.
Explore Other Curated Lists
Best Multimodal AI APIs
A hands-on comparison of the top multimodal AI APIs for processing text, images, video, and audio through a single integration. We evaluated latency, modality coverage, retrieval quality, and developer experience.
Best Video Search Tools
We tested the leading video search and understanding platforms on real-world content libraries. This guide covers visual search, scene detection, transcript-based retrieval, and action recognition.
Best AI Content Moderation Tools
We evaluated content moderation platforms across image, video, text, and audio moderation. This guide covers accuracy, latency, customization, and compliance features for trust and safety teams.