Best Vector Databases: Tested & Compared in 2026
We benchmarked 12 vector databases on query latency, write throughput, cost at scale, and production readiness. Tests run on 100M 768-dim vectors with identical hardware. Full methodology on GitHub.
How We Evaluated
Query Latency
p50 and p99 latency for nearest-neighbor search on 100M 768-dim vectors with top_k=10.
Cost at Scale
Monthly cost to serve 100M vectors with 1K queries/day, including storage, compute, and network egress.
Write Throughput
Sustained vector upsert rate (vectors/sec) measured during bulk ingestion of 10M vectors.
Search Capabilities
Support for hybrid search (dense + sparse + BM25), metadata filtering, multi-vector, and advanced query patterns.
Production Readiness
Storage durability, replication, tiering, observability, multi-tenancy, and operational overhead.
Overview
Mixpeek Vector Store (MVS)
Object-storage-native vector database that runs on your own S3-compatible storage. Dense, sparse, and BM25 hybrid search with automatic hot/warm/cold tiering — no separate database cluster to manage. Bring your own Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, Tigris, Wasabi, or AWS S3.
The only vector database that runs directly on your own S3-compatible storage with automatic hot/warm/cold tiering, giving you database-grade search at object-storage prices.
Strengths
- +~8ms p50 hot search, 92ms warm — competitive latency at a fraction of the cost
- +BYO object storage: runs on any S3-compatible backend you already pay for
- +Automatic tiering moves cold data to object storage (up to 90% cost reduction)
- +Dense + sparse + BM25 hybrid search, aggregations, transactions, and standing queries
- +52K vectors/sec write throughput — fastest in our benchmark
Limitations
- -Currently in private beta — invite required
- -Warm-tier latency (~92ms) higher than always-hot databases for cold-start queries
- -Newer product with a smaller community than Qdrant or Milvus
Real-World Use Cases
- •Large-scale e-commerce product search where 100M+ product embeddings need tiered storage to keep costs under control
- •Multi-tenant SaaS platforms where each customer's vectors are stored on their own S3-compatible bucket for data sovereignty
- •Cost-sensitive RAG deployments where most documents are rarely queried and can live in warm/cold object storage tiers
- •Standing query systems that continuously monitor new vectors against saved queries and trigger alerts on matches
Choose This When
When you need vector search at 100M+ scale and want to control storage costs by tiering cold data to your own object storage instead of paying for always-hot managed databases.
Skip This If
When you need consistently sub-10ms latency on every query including cold data — warm-tier queries add ~80ms of latency compared to always-hot databases.
Integration Example
from mixpeek import Mixpeek
client = Mixpeek(api_key="YOUR_KEY")
# Create a namespace backed by your own S3 storage
client.namespaces.create(
namespace="product-search",
storage_backend="s3",
storage_config={"bucket": "my-vectors", "region": "us-east-1"}
)
# Hybrid search: dense + sparse + BM25
results = client.search.execute(
namespace="product-search",
queries=[
{"type": "text", "value": "wireless noise-canceling headphones", "weight": 0.7},
{"type": "keyword", "value": "Sony WH-1000XM5", "weight": 0.3}
],
filters={"price": {"$lt": 400}},
top_k=10
)Qdrant
High-performance vector search engine written in Rust. Strong payload filtering, named vectors, and a mature managed cloud offering. The go-to choice for teams that want an open-source vector DB with a proven production track record.
Best-in-class payload filtering and named vector support, written in Rust for consistent sub-15ms latency at scale with the most mature open-source community.
Strengths
- +12ms p50 latency at 100M vectors — consistently fast
- +Advanced payload filtering alongside vector search
- +Named vectors for multi-modal embeddings per point
- +Open-source with active community and managed cloud
Limitations
- -All data stays hot — no automatic tiering to cheaper storage
- -Managed cloud costs scale linearly with vector count ($5K/mo at 100M)
- -Requires a separate embedding pipeline
- -Cluster management overhead for very large deployments
Real-World Use Cases
- •Real-time recommendation systems where every query must return results in under 15ms regardless of data temperature
- •Multi-modal search applications using named vectors to store CLIP image embeddings and text embeddings on the same point
- •Security and fraud detection systems that compare transaction embeddings against known patterns with rich payload filtering
- •Content discovery platforms that filter vector search results by complex metadata conditions (date ranges, categories, user segments)
Choose This When
When you need the fastest and most reliable vector search with advanced metadata filtering and can budget for always-hot storage at your scale.
Skip This If
When cost at 100M+ vectors is your primary concern — Qdrant keeps all data hot, so storage costs scale linearly without tiering.
Integration Example
from qdrant_client import QdrantClient
from qdrant_client.models import Distance, VectorParams, PointStruct
client = QdrantClient(url="https://your-cluster.qdrant.io", api_key="YOUR_KEY")
# Create collection with named vectors
client.create_collection(
collection_name="products",
vectors_config={
"text": VectorParams(size=768, distance=Distance.COSINE),
"image": VectorParams(size=512, distance=Distance.COSINE),
}
)
# Search with payload filter
results = client.query_points(
collection_name="products",
query=text_embedding,
using="text",
query_filter={"must": [{"key": "in_stock", "match": {"value": True}}]},
limit=10
)Pinecone
Fully managed serverless vector database with zero operational overhead. Simple API, generous free tier, and good metadata filtering. The easiest vector database to get started with, but costs become unpredictable at scale.
The lowest-friction path to production vector search — fully managed, serverless, and scales to zero, with the best onboarding experience in the market.
Strengths
- +Zero ops — fully managed with serverless scaling
- +Simple API and excellent onboarding experience
- +Good metadata filtering and namespace isolation
- +Serverless option scales to zero when idle
Limitations
- -35ms p50 latency — slower than Qdrant and MVS in our benchmarks
- -No self-hosting option — vendor lock-in
- -Pricing unpredictable at scale ($7K/mo at 100M vectors in our test)
- -15K vectors/sec write throughput — slowest in our benchmark
Real-World Use Cases
- •Rapid prototyping of semantic search features where time-to-market matters more than unit economics
- •Startup MVPs that need vector search without hiring infrastructure engineers to manage databases
- •Simple RAG applications with under 10M vectors where Pinecone's free tier covers the workload
- •Multi-tenant applications using Pinecone namespaces for lightweight customer data isolation
Choose This When
When you want to ship vector search fast with zero operational burden and your scale is under 10M vectors where cost is manageable.
Skip This If
When you need cost predictability at scale, self-hosting for compliance, or sub-20ms latency — Pinecone becomes expensive and slower than alternatives above 10M vectors.
Integration Example
from pinecone import Pinecone
pc = Pinecone(api_key="YOUR_KEY")
# Create a serverless index
pc.create_index(
name="product-search",
dimension=768,
metric="cosine",
spec={"serverless": {"cloud": "aws", "region": "us-east-1"}}
)
index = pc.Index("product-search")
# Upsert with metadata
index.upsert(vectors=[
{"id": "prod-1", "values": embedding, "metadata": {"category": "electronics", "price": 299}}
])
# Query with metadata filter
results = index.query(vector=query_vec, top_k=10, filter={"price": {"$lt": 500}})Weaviate
Open-source vector database with built-in vectorizer modules. Can generate embeddings during ingestion using CLIP, Cohere, or OpenAI models. Hybrid search with BM25 built in. Good balance of features and operational simplicity.
Only production-grade vector database with built-in vectorizer modules that generate embeddings during ingestion, eliminating the need for a separate embedding pipeline.
Strengths
- +Built-in vectorizer modules reduce pipeline complexity
- +Hybrid search combining BM25 and vector search natively
- +18ms p50 latency — solid mid-range performance
- +Active open-source community with good documentation
Limitations
- -Built-in vectorizers add resource overhead and complexity
- -Higher memory footprint than Qdrant
- -No automatic storage tiering — all data stays hot ($3.5K/mo at 100M)
- -Multi-tenancy support still maturing
Real-World Use Cases
- •Knowledge base search where documents are vectorized at ingestion time using built-in OpenAI or Cohere modules
- •E-commerce product discovery combining BM25 keyword matching with semantic vector search for better relevance
- •Content recommendation engines that use CLIP vectorizers to embed images and text in the same space
- •Enterprise search platforms that need hybrid search with tenant isolation using Weaviate's multi-tenancy features
Choose This When
When you want to simplify your stack by having the vector database handle embedding generation and you need native hybrid search (BM25 + vector).
Skip This If
When you need storage tiering for cost optimization at scale, or when the resource overhead of built-in vectorizers is a concern for your deployment.
Integration Example
import weaviate
from weaviate.classes.config import Configure, Property, DataType
client = weaviate.connect_to_weaviate_cloud(
cluster_url="https://your-cluster.weaviate.network",
auth_credentials=weaviate.auth.AuthApiKey("YOUR_KEY")
)
# Create collection with built-in vectorizer
client.collections.create(
name="Articles",
vectorizer_config=Configure.Vectorizer.text2vec_openai(),
properties=[
Property(name="title", data_type=DataType.TEXT),
Property(name="body", data_type=DataType.TEXT),
]
)
# Hybrid search: BM25 + vector
articles = client.collections.get("Articles")
results = articles.query.hybrid(query="machine learning best practices", alpha=0.7, limit=10)Milvus / Zilliz
Scalable open-source vector database designed for billion-scale deployments. Distributed architecture with GPU-accelerated indexing. Zilliz Cloud provides a managed offering. The most battle-tested option for truly massive collections.
The most proven distributed vector database for billion-scale deployments with GPU-accelerated indexing and the widest selection of index types.
Strengths
- +Proven at billion-vector scale with GPU-accelerated indexing
- +Multiple index types (IVF, HNSW, DiskANN, ScaNN)
- +Strong partition and sharding support for distributed deployments
- +Managed offering (Zilliz Cloud) reduces operational burden
Limitations
- -Complex deployment — many moving parts (etcd, MinIO, Pulsar)
- -Higher operational overhead than managed alternatives
- -Metadata filtering less flexible than Qdrant
- -Documentation inconsistent across versions
Real-World Use Cases
- •Billion-vector similarity search for large-scale image retrieval systems like reverse image search engines
- •Drug discovery pipelines that compare molecular embeddings across billions of compound representations
- •Social media platforms matching user-generated content against a massive library of known embeddings for content moderation
- •Autonomous vehicle perception systems that match sensor embeddings against large-scale map and object databases
Choose This When
When you are operating at billion-vector scale and need GPU-accelerated indexing with a distributed architecture that can shard across many nodes.
Skip This If
When operational simplicity matters — Milvus requires managing etcd, MinIO, and message queues, which is significant overhead compared to managed alternatives.
Integration Example
from pymilvus import connections, Collection, FieldSchema, CollectionSchema, DataType
connections.connect(host="localhost", port="19530")
# Define schema with multiple vector fields
fields = [
FieldSchema(name="id", dtype=DataType.INT64, is_primary=True, auto_id=True),
FieldSchema(name="text_embedding", dtype=DataType.FLOAT_VECTOR, dim=768),
FieldSchema(name="image_embedding", dtype=DataType.FLOAT_VECTOR, dim=512),
FieldSchema(name="category", dtype=DataType.VARCHAR, max_length=100),
]
schema = CollectionSchema(fields)
collection = Collection("products", schema)
# Create GPU-accelerated index
collection.create_index("text_embedding", {"index_type": "GPU_IVF_FLAT", "metric_type": "COSINE", "params": {"nlist": 1024}})
# Search
collection.search(data=[query_vec], anns_field="text_embedding", param={"nprobe": 16}, limit=10)Turbopuffer
Object-storage-native vector database with a similar philosophy to MVS — data lives in S3 with a caching layer for hot queries. Competitive latency for warm data and very cost-effective at scale. Early-stage but promising.
Simplest object-storage-native vector database with transparent per-query pricing and no infrastructure to manage.
Strengths
- +Object-storage-native like MVS — very cost-effective at scale
- +Good warm-data latency with intelligent caching
- +Simple API with low operational overhead
- +Transparent pricing model
Limitations
- -No hybrid search (dense only — no sparse or BM25)
- -No aggregations, transactions, or standing queries
- -Smaller feature set than MVS, Qdrant, or Weaviate
- -Early-stage with limited production case studies
Real-World Use Cases
- •Large-scale semantic search where cost is the primary concern and hybrid search is not required
- •Archival search systems where most data is cold but occasionally queried with acceptable warm-up latency
- •Research and analytics pipelines that need to search large vector collections without ongoing compute costs
- •Startup-scale applications that want object-storage economics without the feature complexity of larger platforms
Choose This When
When you need cost-effective dense vector search at scale and your use case does not require hybrid search, aggregations, or advanced query features.
Skip This If
When you need hybrid search (BM25 + dense + sparse), standing queries, transactions, or the advanced features available in MVS, Qdrant, or Weaviate.
Integration Example
import turbopuffer as tpuf
# Connect and create a namespace
ns = tpuf.Namespace("product-search")
# Upsert vectors with attributes
ns.upsert(
ids=[1, 2, 3],
vectors=[embedding_1, embedding_2, embedding_3],
attributes={
"category": ["electronics", "clothing", "electronics"],
"price": [299, 49, 599]
}
)
# Query with attribute filter
results = ns.query(
vector=query_embedding,
top_k=10,
filters=["category", "Eq", "electronics"]
)
for match in results:
print(f"ID: {match.id}, Score: {match.dist}")pgvector (PostgreSQL)
PostgreSQL extension that adds vector similarity search to your existing Postgres database. Zero additional infrastructure if you already run Postgres. Good for small to mid-scale workloads where you want vectors alongside relational data.
Zero-infrastructure vector search for teams already running Postgres — add an extension and get similarity search alongside your existing relational data.
Strengths
- +Zero additional infrastructure — just add the extension
- +Full SQL support alongside vector search
- +ACID transactions for vector and relational data together
- +Massive ecosystem of Postgres tooling and hosting options
Limitations
- -Performance degrades significantly above 10M vectors
- -No purpose-built ANN index — HNSW support is newer and less tuned
- -Lacks advanced features like multi-vector, hybrid search, or tiering
- -Not designed for high-throughput vector workloads
Real-World Use Cases
- •Adding semantic search to an existing Postgres-backed application without introducing a new database into the stack
- •Internal tools and admin panels that need vector search alongside complex relational queries and joins
- •MVP and prototype applications where keeping the entire data model in one database reduces operational complexity
- •Content management systems that need to find similar articles or products using embeddings stored alongside metadata
Choose This When
When you already run Postgres, your vector count is under 10M, and you want to avoid adding another database to your stack.
Skip This If
When you need production-grade vector search at scale (above 10M vectors), high write throughput, or advanced features like hybrid search and storage tiering.
Integration Example
-- Enable pgvector
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS vector;
-- Create table with vector column
CREATE TABLE products (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT,
category TEXT,
embedding vector(768)
);
-- Create HNSW index for fast ANN search
CREATE INDEX ON products USING hnsw (embedding vector_cosine_ops);
-- Combined SQL + vector search
SELECT name, category, 1 - (embedding <=> $1::vector) as similarity
FROM products
WHERE category = 'electronics'
ORDER BY embedding <=> $1::vector
LIMIT 10;Chroma
Lightweight, developer-friendly vector database designed for RAG applications and rapid prototyping. Embedded-first architecture that runs in-process with your Python app. Not built for production scale, but unbeatable for getting started quickly.
The fastest path from zero to working vector search — runs in-process with automatic embedding generation, no server or configuration required.
Strengths
- +Fastest time-to-hello-world of any vector DB
- +Runs in-process — no separate server needed
- +Great Python and JavaScript SDKs
- +Built-in embedding functions for quick prototyping
Limitations
- -Not designed for production scale (struggles above 1M vectors)
- -No distributed architecture or replication
- -Limited query capabilities compared to Qdrant or MVS
- -No storage tiering or cost optimization features
Real-World Use Cases
- •Hackathon projects and weekend prototypes where you need vector search running in under 5 minutes
- •Local development and testing of RAG pipelines before deploying to a production vector database
- •Educational projects and tutorials where simplicity and readability of code matter most
- •Single-user AI assistants and personal knowledge bases with small document collections
Choose This When
When you are prototyping, learning, or building a personal project and want vector search running in minutes with zero infrastructure.
Skip This If
When you need production scale (above 1M vectors), durability guarantees, distributed architecture, or any form of storage optimization.
Integration Example
import chromadb
# In-process — no server needed
client = chromadb.Client()
# Create collection with built-in embedding function
collection = client.create_collection(
name="my-docs",
embedding_function=chromadb.utils.embedding_functions.OpenAIEmbeddingFunction(api_key="YOUR_KEY")
)
# Add documents — embeddings generated automatically
collection.add(
documents=["AI is transforming search", "Vector databases enable similarity search"],
ids=["doc-1", "doc-2"]
)
# Query with natural language
results = collection.query(query_texts=["how do vector databases work?"], n_results=5)
print(results["documents"])Vespa
Open-source search and recommendation engine from Yahoo that combines vector search with traditional text search, structured queries, and ML model serving in a single system. Battle-tested at massive scale.
The only search engine that natively unifies vector search, full-text BM25, structured filtering, and ML model inference in a single query path, proven at billion-document scale.
Strengths
- +Proven at Yahoo/Verizon scale (billions of documents)
- +Combines vector, text, and structured search in one engine
- +Built-in ML model serving for re-ranking and inference at query time
- +Strong multi-tenancy and real-time indexing
Limitations
- -Steep learning curve — custom config language and deployment model
- -Heavier operational footprint than purpose-built vector databases
- -Java-based stack may not align with Python-centric ML teams
- -Documentation can be dense and assumes distributed systems expertise
Real-World Use Cases
- •Large-scale e-commerce search combining text matching, vector similarity, and business rules in a single query
- •News and content recommendation platforms that re-rank results using ML models served directly in the search engine
- •Ad-serving platforms that need real-time vector matching with complex filtering across billions of candidate ads
- •Conversational search systems that blend keyword retrieval with semantic vector search and learned ranking models
Choose This When
When you need a unified search engine that combines vector similarity, text matching, structured queries, and learned ranking in one system — especially at massive scale.
Skip This If
When you want a lightweight, easy-to-deploy vector database — Vespa's distributed Java-based architecture has a steep learning curve and operational overhead.
Integration Example
from vespa.application import Vespa
# Connect to Vespa instance
app = Vespa(url="https://your-app.vespacloud.com")
# Hybrid query: text + vector + filtering + ML re-ranking
response = app.query(body={
"yql": "select * from products where userQuery() and category contains 'electronics'",
"query": "noise canceling headphones",
"ranking": "hybrid-with-reranking",
"input.query(user_embedding)": query_vector,
"hits": 10
})
for hit in response.hits:
print(f"{hit['fields']['title']}: {hit['relevance']:.4f}")LanceDB
Open-source vector database built on the Lance columnar format. Serverless, embedded-first with native multimodal storage — stores images, video frames, and text alongside vectors in a single table. Zero infrastructure to start.
The only embedded vector database built on a columnar format designed for ML, enabling zero-infrastructure multimodal search with native PyArrow integration.
Strengths
- +Embedded-first: runs in-process with zero server infrastructure
- +Native multimodal storage (images, vectors, text in one table)
- +Lance columnar format optimized for ML read patterns
- +Zero-copy integration with PyArrow and Pandas
Limitations
- -Cloud offering still in early stages
- -Smaller community and fewer production case studies
- -No built-in embedding generation pipeline
- -Distributed mode less mature than Milvus or Vespa
Real-World Use Cases
- •ML training pipelines that store image datasets with embeddings in a single Lance table for fast iteration
- •Notebook-driven data science workflows that need vector search without spinning up a separate database
- •Video frame retrieval systems that store extracted frames and their embeddings in columnar format for efficient scanning
- •Lightweight RAG applications that want to keep documents and vectors co-located without external infrastructure
Choose This When
When you want a lightweight, embedded vector database that stores multimodal data in a columnar format and integrates natively with Python ML tooling.
Skip This If
When you need a production-grade distributed system with enterprise SLAs, high-availability replication, or managed cloud infrastructure.
Integration Example
import lancedb
import pyarrow as pa
db = lancedb.connect("~/.lancedb")
# Create table with vectors and metadata
data = [
{"text": "wireless headphones", "vector": emb_1, "price": 299, "image_uri": "s3://img/1.jpg"},
{"text": "bluetooth speaker", "vector": emb_2, "price": 79, "image_uri": "s3://img/2.jpg"},
]
table = db.create_table("products", data)
# Full-text + vector hybrid search
results = (table
.search(query_embedding)
.where("price < 200")
.limit(10)
.to_pandas())
print(results[["text", "price", "_distance"]])Elasticsearch (kNN)
The established search engine now supports approximate nearest neighbor (kNN) vector search alongside its full-text capabilities. Ideal for teams already running Elasticsearch that want to add vector search without adopting a new database.
The most mature search ecosystem with decades of production hardening, now augmented with vector search — add kNN to your existing Elasticsearch without a second database.
Strengths
- +Add vector search to an existing Elasticsearch deployment
- +Mature full-text search with decades of production hardening
- +Combine kNN, BM25, and structured queries in a single request
- +Massive ecosystem: Kibana, Logstash, Beats, and hundreds of integrations
Limitations
- -Vector search performance lags behind purpose-built vector databases
- -High memory and storage overhead for vector indexing
- -Complex cluster management at scale
- -kNN search is newer and less optimized than core text search
Real-World Use Cases
- •Adding semantic search to an existing Elasticsearch-powered e-commerce site without migrating to a new search engine
- •Hybrid search applications that combine traditional BM25 text retrieval with vector similarity in a single query
- •Log and observability platforms that want to add embedding-based anomaly detection alongside existing text search
- •Enterprise search portals that need vector search integrated with existing Elastic security, audit, and access controls
Choose This When
When you already run Elasticsearch and want to add vector search capabilities without introducing and maintaining a separate vector database.
Skip This If
When vector search performance is critical — purpose-built vector databases (Qdrant, MVS, Milvus) significantly outperform Elasticsearch's kNN on both latency and throughput.
Integration Example
from elasticsearch import Elasticsearch
es = Elasticsearch("https://your-cluster.es.cloud:9243", api_key="YOUR_KEY")
# Create index with dense vector field
es.indices.create(index="products", body={
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"title": {"type": "text"},
"embedding": {"type": "dense_vector", "dims": 768, "index": True, "similarity": "cosine"}
}
}
})
# Hybrid search: kNN + BM25
results = es.search(index="products", body={
"knn": {"field": "embedding", "query_vector": query_vec, "k": 10, "num_candidates": 100},
"query": {"match": {"title": "wireless headphones"}},
"rank": {"rrf": {}} # Reciprocal rank fusion
})Marqo
Open-source tensor search engine that handles embedding generation, storage, and search in one system. Brings its own models (CLIP, E5, SBERT) and generates embeddings at index time — no external pipeline needed.
The only vector search engine that ships with pre-loaded multimodal models (CLIP, E5, SBERT) and handles embedding generation, storage, and search in one API call.
Strengths
- +End-to-end: generates embeddings and searches them in one system
- +Pre-loaded with popular models (CLIP, E5, SBERT, OpenCLIP)
- +Native multimodal search (text-to-image, image-to-image)
- +Simple API that abstracts away vector complexity
Limitations
- -Embedding at index time adds CPU/GPU overhead and latency
- -Smaller scale ceiling than Milvus, Qdrant, or MVS
- -Less control over embedding pipeline compared to BYO-vector approach
- -Cloud offering less mature than Pinecone or Weaviate Cloud
Real-World Use Cases
- •E-commerce visual search where shoppers upload photos and find similar products without a pre-built embedding pipeline
- •Content moderation systems that need text-to-image and image-to-image matching using CLIP embeddings
- •Digital asset management platforms that auto-index images and documents with built-in models for instant search
- •Rapid prototyping of multimodal search features where the built-in models eliminate the need for ML infrastructure
Choose This When
When you want multimodal search (text + images) working immediately without setting up embedding models, vector databases, and integration code separately.
Skip This If
When you need fine-grained control over your embedding models, or when you are operating at a scale where the overhead of built-in embedding generation becomes a bottleneck.
Integration Example
import marqo
mq = marqo.Client(url="http://localhost:8882")
# Create index with built-in CLIP model
mq.create_index("products", model="open_clip/ViT-B-32/laion2b_s34b_b79k",
treat_urls_and_pointers_as_images=True)
# Index documents — embeddings generated automatically
mq.index("products").add_documents([
{"title": "Red Sneakers", "image": "https://example.com/sneakers.jpg", "_id": "1"},
{"title": "Blue Jacket", "image": "https://example.com/jacket.jpg", "_id": "2"},
])
# Multimodal search: text query finds images
results = mq.index("products").search("sporty red shoes")
for hit in results["hits"]:
print(f"{hit['title']}: {hit['_score']:.4f}")Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best vector database for production in 2026?
It depends on your scale and budget. For most production workloads, MVS offers the best cost-to-performance ratio because it uses your existing object storage (S3, B2, R2) instead of requiring a separate always-hot database. For teams that need consistently sub-10ms latency and can afford always-hot storage, Qdrant is the proven choice. For zero-ops simplicity, Pinecone is easiest to get started with but becomes expensive at scale.
Which vector database is cheapest at 100M+ vectors?
MVS is significantly cheaper at scale because it stores vectors on your own object storage (S3, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, etc.) and only keeps frequently queried data hot. In our benchmark, MVS cost $800/month for 100M vectors (80% warm tier) compared to $5,000 for Qdrant Cloud, $3,500 for Weaviate, and $7,000 for Pinecone. Turbopuffer follows a similar object-storage-native model and is also cost-effective, but lacks hybrid search.
What is the difference between a vector database and a vector store?
In practice, they are often used interchangeably. A 'vector store' sometimes refers to a simpler system that just stores and retrieves vectors (like pgvector or Chroma), while a 'vector database' implies full database capabilities: ACID transactions, replication, filtering, aggregations, and production-grade durability. MVS blurs this line further by being a vector database that stores data in object storage — giving you database features with store-level economics.
Can I use my own object storage with a vector database?
Most vector databases (Qdrant, Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus) manage their own storage — you cannot bring your own S3 bucket. MVS and Turbopuffer are exceptions: both are built on object storage from the ground up. MVS supports any S3-compatible backend (AWS S3, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, Tigris, Wasabi), so your data stays in storage you already control and pay for. This also means no vendor lock-in on the storage layer.
Which vector database is best for RAG (retrieval-augmented generation)?
For RAG, you want hybrid search (combining dense vectors with keyword matching) and good metadata filtering. Weaviate and MVS both offer native BM25 + vector hybrid search. MVS adds multi-stage retrieval pipelines that let you chain filter → sort → reduce → enrich stages — useful for complex RAG that needs more than a single similarity query. For simple RAG prototypes, Chroma is the fastest to set up.
How do vector database benchmarks work?
Our benchmarks use 100M 768-dimensional vectors (float32) on equivalent hardware. We measure p50/p90/p99 query latency at top_k=10, sustained write throughput (vectors/sec during bulk upsert), and monthly cost at a standardized query load (1K queries/day). Full methodology, raw data, and reproduction scripts are available at github.com/mixpeek/mvs-benchmark.
Ready to Get Started with Mixpeek?
See why teams choose Mixpeek for multimodal AI. Book a demo to explore how our platform can transform your data workflows.
Explore Other Curated Lists
Best Multimodal AI APIs
A hands-on comparison of the top multimodal AI APIs for processing text, images, video, and audio through a single integration. We evaluated latency, modality coverage, retrieval quality, and developer experience.
Best Video Search Tools
We tested the leading video search and understanding platforms on real-world content libraries. This guide covers visual search, scene detection, transcript-based retrieval, and action recognition.
Best AI Content Moderation Tools
We evaluated content moderation platforms across image, video, text, and audio moderation. This guide covers accuracy, latency, customization, and compliance features for trust and safety teams.