Mixpeek Logo
    Login / Signup
    Frame-Accurate Video Retrieval

    Video Similarity Search: Find Matching Clips by Submitting a Video

    Submit a video clip; get back the most similar segments from your library with frame-accurate timestamps. Powered by multimodal video embeddings, scene-aware segmentation, and vector search that scales to billions of clips.

    What is Video Similarity Search?

    A video version of reverse image search. Each video in your library is split into segments and encoded into vectors. At query time, an input clip retrieves the most similar segments — with exact source video and timestamps — in milliseconds.

    Frame-Accurate, Not File-Level

    Results return the exact segment within a longer video — start time, end time, source file. Editors and reviewers jump directly to the moment instead of scrubbing through full files.

    Robust to Re-Encoding

    Multimodal video embeddings cluster duplicates regardless of resolution, watermarking, intro padding, or partial clipping. A 30-second snippet of a longer source still matches the right window.

    Scales to Billions of Clips

    HNSW and IVF-PQ vector indexes return top-K matches in under 10ms even on indexes of billions of segments. The encoder pass on the query clip is the dominant latency cost.

    How Video Similarity Search Works

    Four phases: segment, embed, search, return frame-accurate matches.

    Segment Every Video

    Each video is split into clips by fixed interval, scene change, or shot boundary. Each clip becomes an independent searchable unit with start/end timestamps and source-video lineage.

    Embed Each Clip

    Clips are encoded with a multimodal video model that captures visual content, motion, and (optionally) aligned audio + transcript. The result is one vector per clip in a single embedding space.

    Search by Query Clip

    Submit a video clip; it goes through the same segmentation + embedding pipeline. Approximate nearest neighbor search returns the most similar indexed clips in milliseconds.

    Return Frame-Accurate Matches

    Results come back with the source video, exact timestamps, similarity scores, and metadata. Render them as a clip grid, an editor timeline, or a moderation queue.

    Same pipeline, every modality

    Mixpeek's segmentation + embedding pipeline works for video, audio, and documents. One ingestion path, one retrieval API, one warehouse — see the full multimodal RAG architecture.

    Segmentation Strategies

    The right segmentation makes or breaks recall. Pick the strategy that fits your content.

    Fixed Interval

    Split every N seconds (e.g., 5s clips). Simple, predictable, and great for general-purpose video similarity. Default starting point.

    Scene Detection

    Split on visual scene changes. Each segment is semantically meaningful — best for media archives and broadcast content with clear scene structure.

    Shot Boundary

    Split on camera cuts and transitions. Granular and editor-friendly — ideal for sports, commercials, and any fast-cut content.

    Action / Event

    Split on detected actions, events, or speaker changes. Best for surveillance, sports highlights, and conversational video.

    Build Video Similarity Search in Minutes

    Drop in your videos, choose a segmentation strategy, and call a single retriever endpoint.

    video_similarity_search.py
    from mixpeek import Mixpeek
    
    client = Mixpeek(api_key="YOUR_API_KEY")
    
    # 1. Create a namespace for your video catalog
    client.namespaces.create(
        namespace_name="video-library",
        description="Video similarity search across the full archive",
    )
    
    # 2. Define a collection that segments + embeds video
    #    The pipeline auto-splits each video into clips (by interval, scene
    #    change, or shot boundary) and produces a multimodal embedding per clip.
    client.collections.create(
        collection_name="video-clips",
        feature_extractors=[
            {
                "type": "video_segmentation",
                "strategy": "scene_detection",   # or "interval", "shot_boundary"
            },
            {"type": "video_embedding", "model": "multimodal"},
        ],
    )
    
    # 3. Upload videos and trigger automatic processing
    client.buckets.upload(
        bucket_name="library-videos",
        files=["episode_001.mp4", "episode_002.mp4", "..."],
        auto_process=True,
    )
    
    # 4. Build a video similarity retriever
    retriever = client.retrievers.create(
        retriever_name="video_similarity",
        inputs=[{"name": "query_clip", "type": "video"}],
        settings={
            "stages": [
                {"type": "feature_search", "method": "vector",
                 "modalities": ["video"], "limit": 50},
                {"type": "rerank", "model": "cross-encoder-video", "limit": 10},
            ]
        },
    )
    
    # 5. Submit a query clip and get back matching segments with timestamps
    results = client.retrievers.execute(
        retriever_id=retriever.retriever_id,
        inputs={"query_clip": "https://example.com/query-clip.mp4"},
    )
    
    # Each match returns the source video, start_time, end_time, score, and metadata
    for doc in results.documents:
        print(f"{doc.metadata['source_video']}  "
              f"{doc.metadata['start_time']}s -> {doc.metadata['end_time']}s  "
              f"score={doc.score:.3f}")

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is video similarity search?

    Video similarity search lets you find visually similar video clips by submitting another video as the query. Each indexed video is split into segments and encoded with a multimodal video model; at query time, the input clip is encoded the same way and matched against the index using vector search. Results come back with exact source video, start/end timestamps, and similarity scores.

    How is video similarity search different from reverse video search?

    They are the same technique with different framing. 'Reverse video search' emphasizes the user-facing experience of using a video as the query (analogous to reverse image search). 'Video similarity search' emphasizes the underlying capability — finding clips that are visually similar to a reference. Both rely on segmenting videos, embedding each segment, and running vector similarity search. See the original reverse video search guide for the deeper walkthrough.

    What makes video similarity search different from image search?

    Video adds the temporal dimension. You can't just embed one frame — you need to handle motion, scene changes, audio, and the sequential nature of clips. Production systems split each video into segments (fixed interval, scene-detected, or shot-bounded), embed each segment, and return matches with start/end timestamps so users can jump directly to the relevant moment.

    How does it find duplicate or re-uploaded videos?

    Multimodal video embeddings cluster duplicates together regardless of resolution, watermarking, intro/outro padding, color grading, or partial clipping. A 30-second clip of a longer video will match the corresponding window in the source. Pair vector search with perceptual video hashes (pHash, TMK+PDQF) for exact-copy detection alongside semantic similarity.

    Can it search by a still image to find matching video frames?

    Yes — because multimodal embeddings put images and video frames in the same vector space, you can submit a single image as the query and retrieve all matching frames or clips across your video library. This powers 'find me every shot of this person/product/scene' workflows.

    How fast is video similarity search at scale?

    Production systems return matches in under 200ms over indexes of billions of clip segments. Vector search itself is sub-10ms with HNSW or IVF-PQ; the rest of the latency budget covers the encoder pass over the query clip. Mixpeek runs both on managed GPU infrastructure that auto-scales with traffic.

    What embedding models are best for video similarity?

    Multimodal video encoders (VideoCLIP, InternVideo, Mixpeek's default video embedder) are the strongest baseline because they capture motion and temporal context, not just per-frame visual features. CLIP/SigLIP applied per-frame works but loses motion information. For action recognition or surveillance, a temporal-aware encoder is meaningfully better.

    How does Mixpeek support video similarity search?

    Mixpeek is purpose-built for multimodal data: ingest videos via bucket upload, define a collection with a video segmentation + embedding extractor, and call a retriever endpoint to match a query clip against your index. Segmentation strategy, embedding model, filters, and reranking are all configurable. The same infrastructure also handles images, PDFs, and audio in one warehouse.

    Can I combine video similarity with text or metadata filters?

    Yes — Mixpeek retriever pipelines support hybrid search that fuses vector similarity with structured metadata filters and free-text queries. Example: 'find clips similar to this query video, where the source is from 2024 and the brand metadata equals Nike.' The retriever composes filter, vector search, and rerank stages into one API call.

    Build Video Similarity Search on Your Library

    Stop scrubbing tape libraries and grepping filenames. Index your videos with a multimodal encoder, search by query clip, and ship deduplication, copyright detection, and forensic search in one pipeline.